Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Add missing check and destroy for alloc_workqueue

[Jiasheng Jiang]

On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 02:29:22AM +0800, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 05:09:34PM +0800, Jiasheng Jiang wrote:
>> Add checks for the return value of alloc_workqueue and
>> alloc_ordered_workqueue as they may return NULL pointer and cause NULL
>> pointer dereference.
>> Moreover, destroy them when fails later in order to avoid memory leak.
>> Because in `drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c`, if
>> intel_modeset_init_noirq fails, its workqueues will not be destroyed.
>> 
>> Fixes: c26a058680dc ("drm/i915: Use a high priority wq for nonblocking plane updates")
>> Fixes: 757fffcfdffb ("drm/i915: Put all non-blocking modesets onto an ordered wq")
>> Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> So you have an entire pile of these, and I think that's a really good
> excuse to
> - create a drmm_alloc_workqueue helper for these (and
>   drmm_alloc_ordered_workqueue) using the drmm_add_action_or_reset()
>   function for automatic drm_device cleanup
> - use that instead in all drivers, which means you do not have to make any
>   error handling mor complex
> 
> Up for that? In that case please also convert any existing alloc*workqueue
> callsites in drm, and make this all a patch series (since then there would
> be dependencies).

Fine, I have submitted two patches. The first one create the
drmm_alloc_workqueue and drmm_alloc_ordered_workqueue helpers. And the
second one replace the alloc*workqueue with DRM helpers in
`drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c`.
If there is no problem in these two, I will submitted the other patches
that replace the alloc*workqueue in other DRM files.

Thanks,
Jiang