Otherwise it's bit silly, and we might throw out the driver for the
screen the user is actually looking at. I haven't found a bug report
for this case yet, but we did get bug reports for the analog case
where we're throwing out the efifb driver.
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216303
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Helge Deller <deller@xxxxxx>
Cc: linux-fbdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
drivers/video/aperture.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/video/aperture.c b/drivers/video/aperture.c
index 3d8c925c7365..6f351a58f6c6 100644
--- a/drivers/video/aperture.c
+++ b/drivers/video/aperture.c
@@ -341,6 +341,9 @@ int aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_devices(struct pci_dev *pdev, const char *na
return ret;
}
+ if (!primary)
+ return 0;
+
/*
* WARNING: Apparently we must kick fbdev drivers before vgacon,
* otherwise the vga fbdev driver falls over.
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature