Re: [PATCH V2] doc:it_IT: add translation for botching-up-ioctl.rst

[Federico Vaga]

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 04:03:37PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > This patch adds the translation for the botching up ioctl document.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > V1 -> V2 use the kernel-doc mecanism to link functions in documents
> >
> >  .../it_IT/process/botching-up-ioctls.rst      | 249 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  .../translations/it_IT/process/index.rst      |   1 +
> >  2 files changed, 250 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/botching-up-ioctls.rst
>
> I've applied this, but I have to ask:
>
> > diff --git a/Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/botching-up-ioctls.rst b/Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/botching-up-ioctls.rst
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..91732cdf808a
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/botching-up-ioctls.rst
> > @@ -0,0 +1,249 @@
> > +.. include:: ../disclaimer-ita.rst
> > +
> > +:Original: Documentation/process/botching-up-ioctls.rst
> > +
> > +==========================================
> > +(Come evitare di) Raffazzonare delle ioctl
> > +==========================================
>
> Is "raffazzonare" the right verb here?  Something like "pasticciare"
> seems closer to me, but I'm not the expert here.


Raffazzonare: there is the intention to do it right, but the result perhaps is
not the best

Pasticciare: the result is not the best, and perhaps there was not even the
intention to do it right

In a way they are synonymous: there is no guarantee that the result is the best :)


> Thanks,
>
> jon

--
Federico Vaga