Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] Add metrics for neoverse-n2-v2
From: Jing Zhang
Date: Sun Jan 15 2023 - 21:59:22 EST
在 2023/1/15 上午6:40, Ian Rogers 写道:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 8:32 AM Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> 在 2023/1/13 下午5:59, John Garry 写道:
>>> On 13/01/2023 09:22, Jing Zhang wrote:
>>>> Changes since v6:
>>>> - Split patch #1 into 3 smaller patches as suggested by Ian.
>>>> - Change perf_pmu__get_slots into perf_pmu__cpu_slots_per_cycle,
>>>> per John's suggestion;
>>>> - Return NAN instead of 0 in perf_pmu__cpu_slots_per_cycle weak
>>>> function, per John's suggestion;
>>>> - Factor out pmu_core__find_same function, per John's suggestion.
>>>> - Link:https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/all/1673017529-1429208-1-git-send-email-renyu.zj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!LhBq67uDCOsz1k7ZF4aQPHF0Bp8FsMr-ZNgCnBSUKF4qJTFODfnkId7lw_NXqB4qZUCpu-jbY8z8LTckoqFGz2Q8bA$
>>>
>>> This looks fine. But for this code:
>>>
>>> On 13/01/2023 09:22, Jing Zhang wrote:
>>>> +double perf_pmu__cpu_slots_per_cycle(void)
>>>> +{
>>>> + char path[PATH_MAX];
>>>> + unsigned long long slots = 0;
>>>
>>> I would prefer if this returned NAN (and not 0) for when we can't find a pmu or the value from ./caps/slots is zero, but I am not going to get too hung up on that.
>>>
>>
>> Ok, I like this way too.
>>
>>> For series:
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Thank you very much indeed!
>
> Aside a naming nit in 1/9 for series:
>
> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
Thank you sincerely!
> Thanks,
> Ian