[PATCH][next] btrfs: Fix spelling mistake "geneartion" -> "generation"

From: Colin Ian King
Date: Mon Jan 16 2023 - 04:38:58 EST


There is a spelling mistake in a btrfs warning message and in a comment.
Fix them both.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@xxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 2 +-
fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
index 10c26bc8e60e..a5d026041be4 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
@@ -2106,7 +2106,7 @@ static int scrub_checksum_tree_block(struct scrub_block *sblock)
sblock->header_error = 1;
sblock->generation_error = 1;
btrfs_warn_rl(fs_info,
- "tree block %llu mirror %u has bad geneartion, has %llu want %llu",
+ "tree block %llu mirror %u has bad generation, has %llu want %llu",
sblock->logical, sblock->mirror_num,
btrfs_stack_header_generation(h),
sector->generation);
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
index baad1ed7e111..32cd06f7660e 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
@@ -1144,7 +1144,7 @@ static int check_root_item(struct extent_buffer *leaf, struct btrfs_key *key,
/*
* For legacy root item, the members starting at generation_v2 will be
* all filled with 0.
- * And since we allow geneartion_v2 as 0, it will still pass the check.
+ * And since we allow generation_v2 as 0, it will still pass the check.
*/
read_extent_buffer(leaf, &ri, btrfs_item_ptr_offset(leaf, slot),
btrfs_item_size(leaf, slot));
--
2.30.2