Re: [PATCH v3] pipe: use __pipe_{lock,unlock} instead of spinlock

[Al Viro]

On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 04:38:01AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 11:16:13AM +0800, maobibo wrote:
> > Hongchen,
> > 
> > I have a glance with this patch, it simply replaces with
> > spinlock_irqsave with mutex lock. There may be performance
> > improvement with two processes competing with pipe, however
> > for N processes, there will be complex context switches
> > and ipi interruptts.
> > 
> > Can you find some cases with more than 2 processes competing
> > pipe, rather than only unixbench?
> 
> What real applications have pipes with more than 1 writer & 1 reader?
> I'm OK with slowing down the weird cases if the common cases go faster.

>From commit 0ddad21d3e99c743a3aa473121dc5561679e26bb:
    While this isn't a common occurrence in the traditional "use a pipe as a
    data transport" case, where you typically only have a single reader and
    a single writer process, there is one common special case: using a pipe
    as a source of "locking tokens" rather than for data communication.
    
    In particular, the GNU make jobserver code ends up using a pipe as a way
    to limit parallelism, where each job consumes a token by reading a byte
    from the jobserver pipe, and releases the token by writing a byte back
    to the pipe.