Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the nfsd tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Chuck,

On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 14:28:42 +0000 Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 16, 2023, at 7:52 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Chuck,
> > 
> > On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 14:33:06 +0000 Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:  
> >> 
> >> Sorry, I wasn't clear. I need nfsd's for-rc to be picked
> >> up and merged into linux-next before I send a PR.
> >> 
> >> I've trimmed for-next to temporarily remove the duplicate
> >> commit, so you should now be able to continue merging both
> >> into linux-next without an issue.  
> > 
> > I am not sure what you mean.  Your for-rc branch has been in linux-next
> > for a long time and the current version (SHA 7c24fa225081) was merged
> > last Friday.  
> 
> My bad. I was looking in the wrong place.

No worries.

> > For clarity, the cel-fixes tree and the nfsd tree are both branches of
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cel/linux - the for-rc
> > and for-next branches respectively.
> > 
> > Maybe I should rename cel-fixes to be nfsd-fixes?  
> 
> Renaming my source branch as well would make things a little more clear.
> 
> How about I name the branches in my repo nfsd-next and nfsd-fixes?

Yes, that sounds good.  Let me know when you have done that and I will
update my end.  In the mean time, I will rename the cel-fixes tree to
nfsd-fixes.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachment: pgpd3KY6HuWwR.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature