Re: [PATCH v11 024/113] KVM: TDX: Do TDX specific vcpu initialization

From: Huang, Kai
Date: Thu Jan 19 2023 - 05:38:38 EST

Next message: Krzysztof Kozlowski: "Re: [PATCH v6 01/10] drm/hdcp: Add drm_hdcp_atomic_check()"
Previous message: Krzysztof Kozlowski: "Re: [PATCH v6 09/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add support for HDCP in dp-controller"
In reply to: Zhi Wang: "Re: [PATCH v11 024/113] KVM: TDX: Do TDX specific vcpu initialization"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 2023-01-12 at 08:31 -0800, isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> TD guest vcpu need to be configured before ready to run which requests
> addtional information from Device model (e.g. qemu), one 64bit value is
> passed to vcpu's RCX as an initial value.
>

The first half sentence doesn't parse to me. It also has grammar issue.

Also, the second half only talks about TDH.VP.INIT, but there's more regarding
to creating/initializing a TDX guest vcpu. IMHO It would be better if you can
briefly describe the whole sequence here so people can get some idea about your
code below.

Btw, I don't understand what's the point of pointing out "64bit value passed to
vcpu's RCX ...". You can add this to the comment instead. If it is important,
then please add more to explain it so people can understand more.

> Repurpose KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_OP
> to vcpu-scope and add new sub-commands KVM_TDX_INIT_VCPU under it for such
> additional vcpu configuration.

I am not sure using the same command for both per-VM and per-vcpu ioctls is a
good idea. Is there any existing example does this?

>
> Add callback for kvm vCPU-scoped operations of KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_OP and
> add a new subcommand, KVM_TDX_INIT_VCPU, for further vcpu initialization.

Personally I prefer KVM_TDX_VCPU_CREATE (instead of INIT) but will leave to
maintainers.

>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c | 9 ++
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c | 147 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.h | 7 ++
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/x86_ops.h | 10 +-
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 6 ++
> tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 1 +
> 9 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h
> index 1a27f3aee982..e3e9b1c2599b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h
> @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ KVM_X86_OP(enable_smi_window)
> #endif
> KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL(dev_mem_enc_ioctl)
> KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL(mem_enc_ioctl)
> +KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL(vcpu_mem_enc_ioctl)
> KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL(mem_enc_register_region)
> KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL(mem_enc_unregister_region)
> KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL(vm_copy_enc_context_from)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 30f4ddb18548..35773f925cc5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1698,6 +1698,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops {
>
> int (*dev_mem_enc_ioctl)(void __user *argp);
> int (*mem_enc_ioctl)(struct kvm *kvm, void __user *argp);
> + int (*vcpu_mem_enc_ioctl)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, void __user *argp);
> int (*mem_enc_register_region)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_enc_region *argp);
> int (*mem_enc_unregister_region)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_enc_region *argp);
> int (*vm_copy_enc_context_from)(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int source_fd);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index b8f28d86d4fd..9236c1699c48 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -536,6 +536,7 @@ struct kvm_pmu_event_filter {
> enum kvm_tdx_cmd_id {
> KVM_TDX_CAPABILITIES = 0,
> KVM_TDX_INIT_VM,
> + KVM_TDX_INIT_VCPU,
>
> KVM_TDX_CMD_NR_MAX,
> };
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c
> index 59813ca05f36..23b3ffc3fe23 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c
> @@ -103,6 +103,14 @@ static int vt_mem_enc_ioctl(struct kvm *kvm, void __user *argp)
> return tdx_vm_ioctl(kvm, argp);
> }
>
> +static int vt_vcpu_mem_enc_ioctl(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, void __user *argp)
> +{
> + if (!is_td_vcpu(vcpu))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return tdx_vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, argp);
> +}
> +
> struct kvm_x86_ops vt_x86_ops __initdata = {
> .name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
>
> @@ -249,6 +257,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops vt_x86_ops __initdata = {
>
> .dev_mem_enc_ioctl = tdx_dev_ioctl,
> .mem_enc_ioctl = vt_mem_enc_ioctl,
> + .vcpu_mem_enc_ioctl = vt_vcpu_mem_enc_ioctl,
> };
>
> struct kvm_x86_init_ops vt_init_ops __initdata = {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> index 099f0737a5aa..e2f5a07ad4e5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,11 @@ static __always_inline hpa_t set_hkid_to_hpa(hpa_t pa, u16 hkid)
> return pa | ((hpa_t)hkid << boot_cpu_data.x86_phys_bits);
> }
>
> +static inline bool is_td_vcpu_created(struct vcpu_tdx *tdx)
> +{
> + return tdx->tdvpr_pa;
> +}
> +
> static inline bool is_td_created(struct kvm_tdx *kvm_tdx)
> {
> return kvm_tdx->tdr_pa;
> @@ -65,6 +70,11 @@ static inline bool is_hkid_assigned(struct kvm_tdx *kvm_tdx)
> return kvm_tdx->hkid > 0;
> }
>
> +static inline bool is_td_finalized(struct kvm_tdx *kvm_tdx)
> +{
> + return kvm_tdx->finalized;
> +}
> +
> static void tdx_clear_page(unsigned long page_pa)
> {
> const void *zero_page = (const void *) __va(page_to_phys(ZERO_PAGE(0)));
> @@ -327,7 +337,21 @@ int tdx_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> void tdx_vcpu_free(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> - /* This is stub for now. More logic will come. */
> + struct vcpu_tdx *tdx = to_tdx(vcpu);
> + int i;
> +
> + /* Can't reclaim or free pages if teardown failed. */
> + if (is_hkid_assigned(to_kvm_tdx(vcpu->kvm)))
> + return;

You may want to WARN() if it's a kernel bug you want to catch.
> +
> + if (tdx->tdvpx_pa) {
> + for (i = 0; i < tdx_caps.tdvpx_nr_pages; i++)
> + tdx_reclaim_td_page(tdx->tdvpx_pa[i]);
> + kfree(tdx->tdvpx_pa);
> + tdx->tdvpx_pa = NULL;
> + }
> + tdx_reclaim_td_page(tdx->tdvpr_pa);
> + tdx->tdvpr_pa = 0;
> }
>
> void tdx_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
> @@ -337,6 +361,8 @@ void tdx_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
> /* TDX doesn't support INIT event. */
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(init_event))
> goto td_bugged;
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(is_td_vcpu_created(to_tdx(vcpu))))
> + goto td_bugged;

Again, not sure can we use KVM_BUG_ON()?

>
> /* TDX rquires X2APIC. */
> apic_base_msr.data = APIC_DEFAULT_PHYS_BASE | LAPIC_MODE_X2APIC;
> @@ -791,6 +817,125 @@ int tdx_vm_ioctl(struct kvm *kvm, void __user *argp)
> return r;
> }
>
> +static int tdx_td_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 vcpu_rcx)
> +{
> + struct kvm_tdx *kvm_tdx = to_kvm_tdx(vcpu->kvm);
> + struct vcpu_tdx *tdx = to_tdx(vcpu);
> + unsigned long *tdvpx_pa = NULL;
> + unsigned long tdvpr_pa;
> + unsigned long va;
> + int ret, i;
> + u64 err;
> +
> + if (is_td_vcpu_created(tdx))
> + return -EINVAL;

Ditto. WARN()?

> +
> + va = __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
> + if (!va)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + tdvpr_pa = __pa(va);
> +
> + tdvpx_pa = kcalloc(tdx_caps.tdvpx_nr_pages, sizeof(*tdx->tdvpx_pa),
> + GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT | __GFP_ZERO);

kcalloc() uses __GFP_ZERO internally.

> + if (!tdvpx_pa) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto free_tdvpr;
> + }
> + for (i = 0; i < tdx_caps.tdvpx_nr_pages; i++) {
> + va = __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
> + if (!va)
> + goto free_tdvpx;
> + tdvpx_pa[i] = __pa(va);
> + }
> +
> + err = tdh_vp_create(kvm_tdx->tdr_pa, tdvpr_pa);
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(err)) {
> + ret = -EIO;
> + pr_tdx_error(TDH_VP_CREATE, err, NULL);
> + goto td_bugged_free_tdvpx;
> + }
> + tdx->tdvpr_pa = tdvpr_pa;
> +
> + tdx->tdvpx_pa = tdvpx_pa;
> + for (i = 0; i < tdx_caps.tdvpx_nr_pages; i++) {
> + err = tdh_vp_addcx(tdx->tdvpr_pa, tdvpx_pa[i]);
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(err)) {
> + ret = -EIO;
> + pr_tdx_error(TDH_VP_ADDCX, err, NULL);
> + for (; i < tdx_caps.tdvpx_nr_pages; i++) {
> + free_page((unsigned long)__va(tdvpx_pa[i]));
> + tdvpx_pa[i] = 0;
> + }
> + goto td_bugged;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + err = tdh_vp_init(tdx->tdvpr_pa, vcpu_rcx);
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(err)) {
> + ret = -EIO;
> + pr_tdx_error(TDH_VP_INIT, err, NULL);
> + goto td_bugged;
> + }
> +
> + vcpu->arch.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE;
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +td_bugged_free_tdvpx:
> + for (i = 0; i < tdx_caps.tdvpx_nr_pages; i++) {
> + free_page((unsigned long)__va(tdvpx_pa[i]));
> + tdvpx_pa[i] = 0;
> + }
> + kfree(tdvpx_pa);
> +td_bugged:
> + vcpu->kvm->vm_bugged = true;
> + return ret;
> +
> +free_tdvpx:
> + for (i = 0; i < tdx_caps.tdvpx_nr_pages; i++)
> + if (tdvpx_pa[i])
> + free_page((unsigned long)__va(tdvpx_pa[i]));
> + kfree(tdvpx_pa);

This piece of code appears 3 times in this function (and there are 3 'return
ret;'). I am sure it can be done in one place instead. Can you reorganize?

> + tdx->tdvpx_pa = NULL;
> +free_tdvpr:
> + if (tdvpr_pa)
> + free_page((unsigned long)__va(tdvpr_pa));
> + tdx->tdvpr_pa = 0;
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int tdx_vcpu_ioctl(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, void __user *argp)
> +{
> + struct kvm_tdx *kvm_tdx = to_kvm_tdx(vcpu->kvm);
> + struct vcpu_tdx *tdx = to_tdx(vcpu);
> + struct kvm_tdx_cmd cmd;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (tdx->vcpu_initialized)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (!is_hkid_assigned(kvm_tdx) || is_td_finalized(kvm_tdx))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (copy_from_user(&cmd, argp, sizeof(cmd)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + if (cmd.error || cmd.unused)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* Currently only KVM_TDX_INTI_VCPU is defined for vcpu operation. */
> + if (cmd.flags || cmd.id != KVM_TDX_INIT_VCPU)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = tdx_td_vcpu_init(vcpu, (u64)cmd.data);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + tdx->vcpu_initialized = true;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int __init tdx_module_setup(void)
> {
> const struct tdsysinfo_struct *tdsysinfo;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.h
> index af7fdc1516d5..e909883d60fa 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.h
> @@ -17,12 +17,19 @@ struct kvm_tdx {
> u64 xfam;
> int hkid;
>
> + bool finalized;
> +
> u64 tsc_offset;
> };
>
> struct vcpu_tdx {
> struct kvm_vcpu vcpu;
>
> + unsigned long tdvpr_pa;
> + unsigned long *tdvpx_pa;
> +
> + bool vcpu_initialized;

The 'vcpu_' prefix is kinda redundant.

> +
> /*
> * Dummy to make pmu_intel not corrupt memory.
> * TODO: Support PMU for TDX. Future work.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/x86_ops.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/x86_ops.h
> index 37ab2cfd35bc..fba8d0800597 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/x86_ops.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/x86_ops.h
> @@ -148,11 +148,12 @@ int tdx_vm_init(struct kvm *kvm);
> void tdx_mmu_release_hkid(struct kvm *kvm);
> void tdx_vm_free(struct kvm *kvm);
>
> -int tdx_vm_ioctl(struct kvm *kvm, void __user *argp);
> -
> int tdx_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void tdx_vcpu_free(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void tdx_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event);
> +
> +int tdx_vm_ioctl(struct kvm *kvm, void __user *argp);
> +int tdx_vcpu_ioctl(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, void __user *argp);

Why bother moving the tdx_vm_ioctl() declaration?

> #else
> static inline int tdx_hardware_setup(struct kvm_x86_ops *x86_ops) { return 0; }
> static inline void tdx_hardware_unsetup(void) {}
> @@ -165,11 +166,12 @@ static inline void tdx_mmu_release_hkid(struct kvm *kvm) {}
> static inline void tdx_flush_shadow_all_private(struct kvm *kvm) {}
> static inline void tdx_vm_free(struct kvm *kvm) {}
>
> -static inline int tdx_vm_ioctl(struct kvm *kvm, void __user *argp) { return -EOPNOTSUPP; }
> -
> static inline int tdx_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { return -EOPNOTSUPP; }
> static inline void tdx_vcpu_free(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> static inline void tdx_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event) {}
> +
> +static inline int tdx_vm_ioctl(struct kvm *kvm, void __user *argp) { return -EOPNOTSUPP; }
> +static inline int tdx_vcpu_ioctl(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, void __user *argp) { return -EOPNOTSUPP; }
> #endif
>
> #endif /* __KVM_X86_VMX_X86_OPS_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index e8bc66031a1d..d548d3af6428 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -5976,6 +5976,12 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> case KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR:
> r = kvm_vcpu_ioctl_device_attr(vcpu, ioctl, argp);
> break;
> + case KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_OP:
> + r = -ENOTTY;
> + if (!kvm_x86_ops.vcpu_mem_enc_ioctl)
> + goto out;
> + r = kvm_x86_ops.vcpu_mem_enc_ioctl(vcpu, argp);
> + break;
> default:
> r = -EINVAL;
> }
> diff --git a/tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index eb800965b589..6971f1288043 100644
> --- a/tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -531,6 +531,7 @@ struct kvm_pmu_event_filter {
> enum kvm_tdx_cmd_id {
> KVM_TDX_CAPABILITIES = 0,
> KVM_TDX_INIT_VM,
> + KVM_TDX_INIT_VCPU,
>
> KVM_TDX_CMD_NR_MAX,
> };

Next message: Krzysztof Kozlowski: "Re: [PATCH v6 01/10] drm/hdcp: Add drm_hdcp_atomic_check()"
Previous message: Krzysztof Kozlowski: "Re: [PATCH v6 09/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add support for HDCP in dp-controller"
In reply to: Zhi Wang: "Re: [PATCH v11 024/113] KVM: TDX: Do TDX specific vcpu initialization"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]