Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Assume libbpf 1.0+

[Ian Rogers]

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 9:47 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Em Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 02:41:12PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Anyway, just a data point, I'll check if I'm missing installing it
> > somewhere.
>
> Just asked for libbpf-dev to be installed on the debian:11 container:
>
> [perfbuilder@five 11]$ dsh debian:11
> $ bash
> perfbuilder@589d1572e8cf:/$ ls -la /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbpf.so.0
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Jan 10  2021 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbpf.so.0 -> libbpf.so.0.3.0
> perfbuilder@589d1572e8cf:/$ dpkg -l | grep bpf
> ii  libbpf-dev:amd64                   1:0.3-2                        amd64        eBPF helper library (development files)
> ii  libbpf0:amd64                      1:0.3-2                        amd64        eBPF helper library (shared library)
> ii  libpfm4:amd64                      4.11.1+git32-gd0b85fb-1        amd64        Library to program the performance monitoring events
> perfbuilder@589d1572e8cf:/$
>
> - Arnaldo

Right, the old/ancient libbpf-s are gross, but Debian doesn't use
LIBBPF_DYNAMIC which also isn't a default build option. I guess we
could say there's some testing impact from this cleanup, but I'm not
sure we care.

Thanks,
Ian