Re: [PATCH 0/8] iommu: The early demise of bus ops

[Jason Gunthorpe]

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 07:18:18PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> [ Christoph, Greg, Rafael; feel free to ignore all the IOMMU details,
>  just a heads-up for some pretty trivial header motion in patch #6 ]
> 
> This is sort of an RFC, in the sense that the patches are functionally
> ready but I don't expect that we necessarily want to merge all them
> right away; at this point it's more for the sake of visibility and
> checking if anyone strongly objects to the direction I'm taking.

Looks good to me

Is there anything beyond some typing preventing the removal of the bus
from the out-of-iommu callers?

> I've based these patches on 6.2-rc3 and made no effort to integrate them
> with the IOMMUFD-related work going on in parallel and/or already
> queued, even though there is some functional intersection and almost
> certain conflicts. If we reach a consensus that we would like any of
> this for 6.3 I'll rebase as appropriate.

I don't see a reason to wait..

Jason