Re: [PATCH v11 018/113] KVM: TDX: create/destroy VM structure

[Sean Christopherson]

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023, Zhi Wang wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 20:56:17 +0000 Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What I would like to clarify is: it would be better to have a mechanism to make sure a
> SEAMCALL can succeed at a certain point (or at least trying to succeed) as the 
> magic number would work like a lottery in reality.

Yep, you and I are in agreement on this point.  Ideally, KVM would be able to
guarantee success and treat TDX_OPERAND_BUSY errors as KVM bugs.