Re: [PATCHv4 2/2] mm: use stack_depot_early_init for kmemleak

[Vlastimil Babka]

On 1/19/23 23:42, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 11:32:36 +0100 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > But to be cleaner I'd also suggest Andrew adds the hunk below. The call
> > to stack_depot_init() becomes no-op after this patch so it's not a bug
> > to leave it there, but it's just misleading now.
> >
> > ---8<---
> > diff --git a/mm/kmemleak.c b/mm/kmemleak.c
> > index 91dda5c2753a..55dc8b8b0616 100644
> > --- a/mm/kmemleak.c
> > +++ b/mm/kmemleak.c
> > @@ -2095,7 +2095,6 @@ void __init kmemleak_init(void)
> >   	if (kmemleak_error)
> >   		return;
> >   
> > -	stack_depot_init();
> >   	jiffies_min_age = msecs_to_jiffies(MSECS_MIN_AGE);
> >   	jiffies_scan_wait = msecs_to_jiffies(SECS_SCAN_WAIT * 1000);
> >   
>
> I added your signoff to this.

Fine with me, thanks.

> I used not to bother for such minor to-be-folded fixups, but now
> Stephen sends me automated nags when his scripts detect this.

Ack, will try to remember that next time.