Re: [PATCH] docs: ext4: Fix full name of the GPL
From: Bagas Sanjaya
Date: Sun Jan 22 2023 - 21:11:11 EST
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 07:05:51PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@xxxxxxxxx>
No patch description, really?
> ---
> Documentation/filesystems/ext4/about.rst | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/about.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/about.rst
> index cc76b577d2f4..c150519bbf3f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/about.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/about.rst
> @@ -17,7 +17,8 @@ created demonstration filesystems.
>
> License
> -------
> -This book is licensed under the terms of the GNU Public License, v2.
> +This book is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public License,
> +v2.
The doc has already SPDX identifier above. Please remmove the sentence above
instead.
In recent days, I have seen the sudden influx of s/GNU Public License/GNU
General Public License/g patches from you, for which many developers ask you to
replace with SPDX identifier instead (see [1], [2], and [3]). Please do
a tree-wide SPDX patch.
Thanks.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ad99d227-ce82-319b-6323-b70ac009d0e7@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6d9053c6-b56e-51f4-db47-79264f1f5672@xxxxxxxxxx/
[3]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230122111707.68ddead6@hermes.local/
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature