Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/9] sched: cpumask: improve on cpumask_local_spread() locality

[Valentin Schneider]

On 22/01/23 14:57, Tariq Toukan wrote:
> On 21/01/2023 6:24, Yury Norov wrote:
>>
>> This series was supposed to be included in v6.2, but that didn't happen. It
>> spent enough in -next without any issues, so I hope we'll finally see it
>> in v6.3.
>>
>> I believe, the best way would be moving it with scheduler patches, but I'm
>> OK to try again with bitmap branch as well.
>
> Now that Yury dropped several controversial bitmap patches form the PR,
> the rest are mostly in sched, or new API that's used by sched.
>
> Valentin, what do you think? Can you take it to your sched branch?
>

I would if I had one :-)

Peter/Ingo, any objections to stashing this in tip/sched/core?