Re: [PATCH v1 10/14] drm/msm/disp/dpu: add supports of DSC encoder v1.2 engine
From: Marijn Suijten
Date: Mon Jan 23 2023 - 15:11:44 EST
add support for*
drm/msm/dpu*
On 2023-01-23 10:24:30, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
> DSC V1.2 encoder engine is newly added hardware module. This patch
> add support functions to configure and enable DSC V1.2 encoder engine.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h | 60 +++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_dsc.c | 23 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_dsc.h | 23 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_dsc_1_2.c | 371 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 6 files changed, 463 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_dsc_1_2.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile
> index 28cf52b..271c29a15 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile
> @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ msm-$(CONFIG_DRM_MSM_DPU) += \
> disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.o \
> disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ctl.o \
> disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_dsc.o \
> + disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_dsc_1_2.o \
> disp/dpu1/dpu_dsc_helper.o \
> disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.o \
> disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_intf.o \
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
> index 7f4a439..901e317 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
> @@ -1821,7 +1821,7 @@ static void dpu_encoder_dsc_pipe_cfg(struct dpu_hw_dsc *hw_dsc,
> u32 initial_lines)
> {
> if (hw_dsc->ops.dsc_config)
> - hw_dsc->ops.dsc_config(hw_dsc, dsc, common_mode, initial_lines);
> + hw_dsc->ops.dsc_config(hw_dsc, dsc, common_mode, initial_lines, false);
As usual, an enum is better: readers have no idea what a free-floating
bool means.
>
> if (hw_dsc->ops.dsc_config_thresh)
> hw_dsc->ops.dsc_config_thresh(hw_dsc, dsc);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
> index 978e3bd..7b0b092 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> /*
> - * Copyright (c) 2022. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
> + * Copyright (c) 2022-2023, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
> * Copyright (c) 2015-2018, 2020 The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> */
>
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> #include <linux/bug.h>
> #include <linux/bitmap.h>
> #include <linux/err.h>
> +#include "dpu_hw_mdss.h"
Unused if you remove the unused DECLARE_BITMAP(dsc_pair_mask, DSC_MAX).
>
> /**
> * Max hardware block count: For ex: max 12 SSPP pipes or
> @@ -182,6 +183,7 @@ enum {
> * @DPU_PINGPONG_TE2 Additional tear check block for split pipes
> * @DPU_PINGPONG_SPLIT PP block supports split fifo
> * @DPU_PINGPONG_SLAVE PP block is a suitable slave for split fifo
> + * @DPU_PINGPONG_DSC, Display stream compression blocks
> * @DPU_PINGPONG_DITHER, Dither blocks
> * @DPU_PINGPONG_MAX
> */
> @@ -190,10 +192,32 @@ enum {
> DPU_PINGPONG_TE2,
> DPU_PINGPONG_SPLIT,
> DPU_PINGPONG_SLAVE,
> + DPU_PINGPONG_DSC,
This is not used.
> DPU_PINGPONG_DITHER,
> DPU_PINGPONG_MAX
> };
>
> +
> +/** DSC sub-blocks/features
Newline between /** and the text.
> + * @DPU_DSC_OUTPUT_CTRL Supports the control of the pp id which gets
> + * the pixel output from this DSC.
The original comment is much more concise, can we keep it?
> + * @DPU_DSC_HW_REV_1_1 dsc block supports dsc 1.1 only
> + * @DPU_DSC_HW_REV_1_2 dsc block supports dsc 1.1 and 1.2
Capitalize DSC just like elsewhere.
> + * @DPU_DSC_NATIVE_422_EN, Supports native422 and native420 encoding
> + * @DPU_DSC_ENC, DSC encoder sub block
> + * @DPU_DSC_CTL, DSC ctl sub block
No need for trailing commas in doc comments; if anything replace them
with colons?
> + * @DPU_DSC_MAX
> + */
> +enum {
> + DPU_DSC_OUTPUT_CTRL = 0x1,
> + DPU_DSC_HW_REV_1_1,
> + DPU_DSC_HW_REV_1_2,
> + DPU_DSC_NATIVE_422_EN,
> + DPU_DSC_ENC,
> + DPU_DSC_CTL,
These two enum values only have a meaning within the dpu_hw_dsc_1_2.c
file, and have nothing to do with the other feature flags/block
description. Please move them there (and give _dsc_subblk_offset a
proper enum type).
> + DPU_DSC_MAX
> +};
> +
> /**
> * CTL sub-blocks
> * @DPU_CTL_SPLIT_DISPLAY: CTL supports video mode split display
> @@ -276,15 +300,6 @@ enum {
> };
>
> /**
> - * DSC features
> - * @DPU_DSC_OUTPUT_CTRL Configure which PINGPONG block gets
> - * the pixel output from this DSC.
> - */
> -enum {
> - DPU_DSC_OUTPUT_CTRL = 0x1,
Did this have to move?
> -};
> -
> -/**
> * MACRO DPU_HW_BLK_INFO - information of HW blocks inside DPU
> * @name: string name for debug purposes
> * @id: enum identifying this block
> @@ -346,6 +361,14 @@ struct dpu_pp_blk {
> };
>
> /**
> + * struct dpu_dsc_blk : DSC Encoder sub-blk information
Use a hyphen here and everywhere else:
https://docs.kernel.org/doc-guide/kernel-doc.html
> + * @info: HW register and features supported by this sub-blk
> + */
> +struct dpu_dsc_blk {
> + DPU_HW_SUBBLK_INFO;
> +};
> +
> +/**
> * enum dpu_qos_lut_usage - define QoS LUT use cases
> */
> enum dpu_qos_lut_usage {
> @@ -403,6 +426,7 @@ struct dpu_rotation_cfg {
> * @pixel_ram_size size of latency hiding and de-tiling buffer in bytes
> * @max_hdeci_exp max horizontal decimation supported (max is 2^value)
> * @max_vdeci_exp max vertical decimation supported (max is 2^value)
> + * @max_dsc_width max dsc line width support.
DSC*
> */
> struct dpu_caps {
> u32 max_mixer_width;
> @@ -419,6 +443,7 @@ struct dpu_caps {
> u32 pixel_ram_size;
> u32 max_hdeci_exp;
> u32 max_vdeci_exp;
> + u32 max_dsc_width;
This is never read.
> };
>
> /**
> @@ -494,9 +519,20 @@ struct dpu_dspp_sub_blks {
> struct dpu_pingpong_sub_blks {
> struct dpu_pp_blk te;
> struct dpu_pp_blk te2;
> + struct dpu_pp_blk dsc;
Unused.
> struct dpu_pp_blk dither;
> };
>
> +
> +/**
> + * struct dpu_dsc_sub_blks : DSC sub-blks
> + *
A sub-block of sub-blocks? Use the documentation to explain what this
is for, describe @enc and @ctl.
> + */
> +struct dpu_dsc_sub_blks {
> + struct dpu_dsc_blk enc;
> + struct dpu_dsc_blk ctl;
> +};
> +
> /**
> * dpu_clk_ctrl_type - Defines top level clock control signals
> */
> @@ -641,10 +677,14 @@ struct dpu_merge_3d_cfg {
> * struct dpu_dsc_cfg - information of DSC blocks
> * @id enum identifying this block
> * @base register offset of this block
> + * @len: length of hardware block
> * @features bit mask identifying sub-blocks/features
> + * @dsc_pair_mask: Bitmask of DSCs that can be controlled by same CTL
> */
> struct dpu_dsc_cfg {
> DPU_HW_BLK_INFO;
> + DECLARE_BITMAP(dsc_pair_mask, DSC_MAX);
This bitmask is unused.
> + const struct dpu_dsc_sub_blks *sblk;
> };
>
> /**
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_dsc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_dsc.c
> index 619926d..51e8890 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_dsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_dsc.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> /*
> * Copyright (c) 2020-2022, Linaro Limited
> + * Copyright (c) 2023 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved
> */
>
> #include "dpu_kms.h"
> @@ -41,10 +42,11 @@ static void dpu_hw_dsc_disable(struct dpu_hw_dsc *dsc)
> static void dpu_hw_dsc_config(struct dpu_hw_dsc *hw_dsc,
> struct drm_dsc_config *dsc,
> u32 mode,
> - u32 initial_lines)
> + u32 initial_lines,
> + bool ich_reset_override)
> {
> struct dpu_hw_blk_reg_map *c = &hw_dsc->hw;
> - u32 data;
> + u32 data, lsb, bpp;
> u32 slice_last_group_size;
> u32 det_thresh_flatness;
> bool is_cmd_mode = !(mode & DSC_MODE_VIDEO);
> @@ -58,7 +60,14 @@ static void dpu_hw_dsc_config(struct dpu_hw_dsc *hw_dsc,
> data = (initial_lines << 20);
> data |= ((slice_last_group_size - 1) << 18);
> /* bpp is 6.4 format, 4 LSBs bits are for fractional part */
> - data |= (dsc->bits_per_pixel << 8);
> + data |= dsc->bits_per_pixel << 12;
> + lsb = dsc->bits_per_pixel % 4;
> + bpp = dsc->bits_per_pixel / 4;
> + bpp *= 4;
> + bpp <<= 4;
> + bpp |= lsb;
> +
> + data |= bpp << 8;
Why are you re-adding this nonsense? It was removed in [1] _and_ does
not account for bits_per_pixel _already being in x.4 format_. This will
regress existing hardware.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20221026182824.876933-10-marijn.suijten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> data |= (dsc->block_pred_enable << 7);
> data |= (dsc->line_buf_depth << 3);
> data |= (dsc->simple_422 << 2);
> @@ -221,7 +230,13 @@ struct dpu_hw_dsc *dpu_hw_dsc_init(enum dpu_dsc idx, void __iomem *addr,
>
> c->idx = idx;
> c->caps = cfg;
> - _setup_dsc_ops(&c->ops, c->caps->features);
> +
> + if (test_bit(DPU_DSC_HW_REV_1_1, &c->caps->features))
> + _setup_dsc_ops(&c->ops, c->caps->features);
> + else if (test_bit(DPU_DSC_HW_REV_1_2, &c->caps->features))
> + dpu_dsc_1_2_setup_ops(&c->ops, c->caps->features);
> + else
> + _setup_dsc_ops(&c->ops, c->caps->features);
>
> return c;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_dsc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_dsc.h
> index ae9b5db..a48f572 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_dsc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_dsc.h
> @@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
> /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> -/* Copyright (c) 2020-2022, Linaro Limited */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2020-2022, Linaro Limited
> + * Copyright (c) 2023 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved
> + */
>
> #ifndef _DPU_HW_DSC_H
> #define _DPU_HW_DSC_H
> @@ -33,7 +36,8 @@ struct dpu_hw_dsc_ops {
> void (*dsc_config)(struct dpu_hw_dsc *hw_dsc,
> struct drm_dsc_config *dsc,
> u32 mode,
> - u32 initial_lines);
> + u32 initial_lines,
> + bool ich_reset_override);
>
> /**
> * dsc_config_thresh - programs panel thresholds
> @@ -43,6 +47,12 @@ struct dpu_hw_dsc_ops {
> void (*dsc_config_thresh)(struct dpu_hw_dsc *hw_dsc,
> struct drm_dsc_config *dsc);
>
> + /**
> + * bind_pingpong_blk - enable/disable the connection with pp
Inherit docs from the enum.
> + * @hw_dsc: Pointer to dsc context
DSC*
> + * @enable: enable/disable connection
> + * @pp: pingpong blk id
It's documentation, write out block fully.
> + */
> void (*dsc_bind_pingpong_blk)(struct dpu_hw_dsc *hw_dsc,
> bool enable,
> enum dpu_pingpong pp);
> @@ -51,6 +61,7 @@ struct dpu_hw_dsc_ops {
> struct dpu_hw_dsc {
> struct dpu_hw_blk base;
> struct dpu_hw_blk_reg_map hw;
> + struct dpu_hw_ctl *hw_ctl;
Unused.
>
> /* dsc */
> enum dpu_dsc idx;
> @@ -76,9 +87,17 @@ struct dpu_hw_dsc *dpu_hw_dsc_init(enum dpu_dsc idx, void __iomem *addr,
> */
> void dpu_hw_dsc_destroy(struct dpu_hw_dsc *dsc);
>
> +/**
> + * dpu_hw_dsc - convert base object dpu_hw_base to container
> + * @hw: Pointer to base hardware block
> + * return: Pointer to hardware block container
> + */
> static inline struct dpu_hw_dsc *to_dpu_hw_dsc(struct dpu_hw_blk *hw)
> {
> return container_of(hw, struct dpu_hw_dsc, base);
> }
>
> +void dpu_dsc_1_2_setup_ops(struct dpu_hw_dsc_ops *ops,
> + const unsigned long features);
> +
> #endif /* _DPU_HW_DSC_H */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_dsc_1_2.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_dsc_1_2.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..2be74ae
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_dsc_1_2.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,371 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2020-2021, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> + * Copyright (c) 2023 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved
> + */
> +
> +#include "dpu_kms.h"
> +#include "dpu_hw_catalog.h"
> +#include "dpu_hwio.h"
> +#include "dpu_hw_mdss.h"
> +#include "dpu_hw_dsc.h"
> +
> +
> +#define DSC_CMN_MAIN_CNF 0x00
> +
> +/* DPU_DSC_ENC register offsets */
> +#define ENC_DF_CTRL 0x00
> +#define ENC_GENERAL_STATUS 0x04
> +#define ENC_HSLICE_STATUS 0x08
> +#define ENC_OUT_STATUS 0x0C
> +#define ENC_INT_STAT 0x10
> +#define ENC_INT_CLR 0x14
> +#define ENC_INT_MASK 0x18
> +#define DSC_MAIN_CONF 0x30
> +#define DSC_PICTURE_SIZE 0x34
> +#define DSC_SLICE_SIZE 0x38
> +#define DSC_MISC_SIZE 0x3C
> +#define DSC_HRD_DELAYS 0x40
> +#define DSC_RC_SCALE 0x44
> +#define DSC_RC_SCALE_INC_DEC 0x48
> +#define DSC_RC_OFFSETS_1 0x4C
> +#define DSC_RC_OFFSETS_2 0x50
> +#define DSC_RC_OFFSETS_3 0x54
> +#define DSC_RC_OFFSETS_4 0x58
> +#define DSC_FLATNESS_QP 0x5C
> +#define DSC_RC_MODEL_SIZE 0x60
> +#define DSC_RC_CONFIG 0x64
> +#define DSC_RC_BUF_THRESH_0 0x68
> +#define DSC_RC_BUF_THRESH_1 0x6C
> +#define DSC_RC_BUF_THRESH_2 0x70
> +#define DSC_RC_BUF_THRESH_3 0x74
> +#define DSC_RC_MIN_QP_0 0x78
> +#define DSC_RC_MIN_QP_1 0x7C
> +#define DSC_RC_MIN_QP_2 0x80
> +#define DSC_RC_MAX_QP_0 0x84
> +#define DSC_RC_MAX_QP_1 0x88
> +#define DSC_RC_MAX_QP_2 0x8C
> +#define DSC_RC_RANGE_BPG_OFFSETS_0 0x90
> +#define DSC_RC_RANGE_BPG_OFFSETS_1 0x94
> +#define DSC_RC_RANGE_BPG_OFFSETS_2 0x98
Reindent to line this back up.
> +
> +/* DPU_DSC_CTL register offsets */
> +#define DSC_CTL 0x00
> +#define DSC_CFG 0x04
> +#define DSC_DATA_IN_SWAP 0x08
> +#define DSC_CLK_CTRL 0x0C
> +
> +
> +static int _dsc_calc_ob_max_addr(struct dpu_hw_dsc *hw_dsc, int num_ss)
> +{
> + enum dpu_dsc idx;
> +
> + idx = hw_dsc->idx;
> +
> + if (!(hw_dsc->caps->features & BIT(DPU_DSC_NATIVE_422_EN))) {
Why not swap the bodies instead of inverting this.
> + if (num_ss == 1)
> + return 2399;
> + else if (num_ss == 2)
> + return 1199;
> + } else {
> + if (num_ss == 1)
> + return 1199;
> + else if (num_ss == 2)
> + return 599;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int _dsc_subblk_offset(struct dpu_hw_dsc *hw_dsc, int s_id,
> + u32 *idx)
> +{
> + const struct dpu_dsc_sub_blks *sblk;
> +
> + if (!hw_dsc)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + *idx = 0;
> +
> + sblk = hw_dsc->caps->sblk;
> +
> + switch (s_id) {
> +
> + case DPU_DSC_ENC:
> + *idx = sblk->enc.base;
> + break;
> + case DPU_DSC_CTL:
> + *idx = sblk->ctl.base;
> + break;
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void dpu_hw_dsc_disable_1_2(struct dpu_hw_dsc *hw_dsc)
> +{
> + struct dpu_hw_blk_reg_map *hw;
> + u32 idx;
Can we rename these to offset or subblk_offset or something more clear?
> +
> + if (!hw_dsc)
> + return;
> +
> + if (_dsc_subblk_offset(hw_dsc, DPU_DSC_CTL, &idx))
> + return;
These error checks are excessive: you pass in a non-null hw_dsc and
known enum constant - _dsc_subblk_offset should perhaps not return
errors at all.
> +
> + hw = &hw_dsc->hw;
> + DPU_REG_WRITE(hw, DSC_CFG + idx, 0);
Swap the arguments to + so that it's clear that DSC_CFG is a register on
the subblock offset denoted by "idx", not the other way around.
> +
> + if (_dsc_subblk_offset(hw_dsc, DPU_DSC_ENC, &idx))
> + return;
> +
> + DPU_REG_WRITE(hw, ENC_DF_CTRL + idx, 0);
> + DPU_REG_WRITE(hw, DSC_MAIN_CONF + idx, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static void dpu_hw_dsc_config_1_2(struct dpu_hw_dsc *hw_dsc,
> + struct drm_dsc_config *dsc, u32 mode,
> + u32 initial_lines, bool ich_reset_override)
> +{
> + struct dpu_hw_blk_reg_map *hw;
> + struct msm_display_dsc_info *dsc_info;
> + u32 idx;
> + u32 data = 0;
> + u32 bpp;
> + void __iomem *off;
> +
> + if (!hw_dsc || !dsc)
> + return;
> +
> + hw = &hw_dsc->hw;
> +
> + dsc_info = to_msm_dsc_info(dsc);
> +
> + if (_dsc_subblk_offset(hw_dsc, DPU_DSC_ENC, &idx))
> + return;
> +
> + if (mode & DSC_MODE_SPLIT_PANEL)
> + data |= BIT(0);
> +
> + if (mode & DSC_MODE_MULTIPLEX)
> + data |= BIT(1);
These are well known bitwise definitions for a reason, data |= mode will
do (or out DSC_MODE_VIDEO since you have to shift that one at BIT(9).
> +
> + data |= (dsc_info->num_active_ss_per_enc & 0x3) << 7;
> +
> + DPU_REG_WRITE(hw, DSC_CMN_MAIN_CNF, data);
> +
> + data = (dsc_info->initial_lines & 0xff);
You already get initial_lines passed as function argument, but ignore
it?
> + data |= ((mode & DSC_MODE_VIDEO) ? 1 : 0) << 9;
Yuck. if (mode & DSC_MODE_VIDEO) data |= BIT(9);.
> + if (ich_reset_override)
> + data |= 0xC00; // set bit 10 and 11
Instead of a comment, make this self-describing BIT(10) | BIT(11) code.
> + data |= (_dsc_calc_ob_max_addr(hw_dsc, dsc_info->num_active_ss_per_enc) << 18);
> +
> + DPU_REG_WRITE(hw, ENC_DF_CTRL + idx, data);
> +
> + data = (dsc->dsc_version_minor & 0xf) << 28;
> + if (dsc->dsc_version_minor == 0x2) {
> + if (dsc->native_422)
> + data |= BIT(22);
> + if (dsc->native_420)
> + data |= BIT(21);
> + }
> +
> + bpp = dsc->bits_per_pixel;
As above, don't forget to read the documentation on this field:
Target bits per pixel with 4 fractional bits, bits_per_pixel << 4
> + /* as per hw requirement bpp should be programmed
> + * twice the actual value in case of 420 or 422 encoding
> + */
> + if (dsc->native_422 || dsc->native_420)
> + bpp = 2 * bpp;
> + data |= (dsc->block_pred_enable ? 1 : 0) << 20;
> + data |= (bpp << 10);
Either wrap everything or nothing in ().
> + data |= (dsc->line_buf_depth & 0xf) << 6;
> + data |= dsc->convert_rgb << 4;
> + data |= dsc->bits_per_component & 0xf;
> +
> + DPU_REG_WRITE(hw, DSC_MAIN_CONF + idx, data);
> +
> + data = (dsc->pic_width & 0xffff) |
> + ((dsc->pic_height & 0xffff) << 16);
> +
> + DPU_REG_WRITE(hw, DSC_PICTURE_SIZE + idx, data);
> +
> + data = (dsc->slice_width & 0xffff) |
> + ((dsc->slice_height & 0xffff) << 16);
> +
> + DPU_REG_WRITE(hw, DSC_SLICE_SIZE + idx, data);
> +
> + DPU_REG_WRITE(hw, DSC_MISC_SIZE + idx,
> + (dsc->slice_chunk_size) & 0xffff);
> +
> + data = (dsc->initial_xmit_delay & 0xffff) |
> + ((dsc->initial_dec_delay & 0xffff) << 16);
> +
> + DPU_REG_WRITE(hw, DSC_HRD_DELAYS + idx, data);
> +
> + DPU_REG_WRITE(hw, DSC_RC_SCALE + idx,
> + dsc->initial_scale_value & 0x3f);
> +
> + data = (dsc->scale_increment_interval & 0xffff) |
> + ((dsc->scale_decrement_interval & 0x7ff) << 16);
> +
> + DPU_REG_WRITE(hw, DSC_RC_SCALE_INC_DEC + idx, data);
> +
> + data = (dsc->first_line_bpg_offset & 0x1f) |
> + ((dsc->second_line_bpg_offset & 0x1f) << 5);
> +
> + DPU_REG_WRITE(hw, DSC_RC_OFFSETS_1 + idx, data);
> +
> + data = (dsc->nfl_bpg_offset & 0xffff) |
> + ((dsc->slice_bpg_offset & 0xffff) << 16);
> +
> + DPU_REG_WRITE(hw, DSC_RC_OFFSETS_2 + idx, data);
> +
> + data = (dsc->initial_offset & 0xffff) |
> + ((dsc->final_offset & 0xffff) << 16);
> +
> + DPU_REG_WRITE(hw, DSC_RC_OFFSETS_3 + idx, data);
> +
> + data = (dsc->nsl_bpg_offset & 0xffff) |
> + ((dsc->second_line_offset_adj & 0xffff) << 16);
> +
> + DPU_REG_WRITE(hw, DSC_RC_OFFSETS_4 + idx, data);
> +
> + data = (dsc->flatness_min_qp & 0x1f);
> + data |= (dsc->flatness_max_qp & 0x1f) << 5;
> + data |= (dsc_info->det_thresh_flatness & 0xff) << 10;
dpu_hw_dsc.c computes this on the fly. After removing that, and
using initial_lines from the function parameters, only
dsc_info->num_active_ss_per_enc remains. Do you really need that
msm_display_dsc_info struct here, do you need it at all?
> +
> + DPU_REG_WRITE(hw, DSC_FLATNESS_QP + idx, data);
> +
> + DPU_REG_WRITE(hw, DSC_RC_MODEL_SIZE + idx,
> + (dsc->rc_model_size) & 0xffff);
> +
> + data = dsc->rc_edge_factor & 0xf;
> + data |= (dsc->rc_quant_incr_limit0 & 0x1f) << 8;
> + data |= (dsc->rc_quant_incr_limit1 & 0x1f) << 13;
> + data |= (dsc->rc_tgt_offset_high & 0xf) << 20;
> + data |= (dsc->rc_tgt_offset_low & 0xf) << 24;
> +
> + DPU_REG_WRITE(hw, DSC_RC_CONFIG + idx, data);
> +
> + /* program the dsc wrapper */
> + if (_dsc_subblk_offset(hw_dsc, DPU_DSC_CTL, &idx))
> + return;
> +
> + off = hw->blk_addr + idx;
> +
> + data = BIT(0); /* encoder enable */
> + if (dsc->native_422)
> + data |= BIT(8);
> + else if (dsc->native_420)
> + data |= BIT(9);
> + if (!dsc->convert_rgb)
> + data |= BIT(10);
> + if (dsc->bits_per_component == 8)
> + data |= BIT(11);
> + if (mode & DSC_MODE_SPLIT_PANEL)
> + data |= BIT(12);
> + if (mode & DSC_MODE_MULTIPLEX)
> + data |= BIT(13);
> + if (!(mode & DSC_MODE_VIDEO))
> + data |= BIT(17);
> +
> + if (dsc_info->dsc_4hsmerge_en) {
> + data |= dsc_info->dsc_4hsmerge_padding << 18;
> + data |= dsc_info->dsc_4hsmerge_alignment << 22;
> + data |= BIT(16);
> + }
> +
> + DPU_REG_WRITE(hw, DSC_CFG + idx, data);
> +
> +// DPU_REG_WRITE(hw, DSC_DATA_IN_SWAP + idx, 0x14e5);
No commented-out code please, especially not with //
> +}
> +
> +static void dpu_hw_dsc_config_thresh_1_2(struct dpu_hw_dsc *hw_dsc,
> + struct drm_dsc_config *dsc)
> +{
> + struct dpu_hw_blk_reg_map *hw;
> + struct msm_display_dsc_info *dsc_info;
> + u32 idx, off;
> + int i, j = 0;
> + struct drm_dsc_rc_range_parameters *rc;
> + u32 data = 0, min_qp = 0, max_qp = 0, bpg_off = 0;
> +
> + if (!hw_dsc || !dsc)
> + return;
> +
> + if (_dsc_subblk_offset(hw_dsc, DPU_DSC_ENC, &idx))
> + return;
> +
> + hw = &hw_dsc->hw;
> +
> + dsc_info = to_msm_dsc_info(dsc);
> +
> + rc = dsc->rc_range_params;
> +
> + off = 0;
> + for (i = 0; i < DSC_NUM_BUF_RANGES - 1; i++) {
> + data |= dsc->rc_buf_thresh[i] << (8*j);
Lack of spaces does not make this multiplication any prettier to read.
* has precedence over << but it's better to replicate the () below as
well.
> + j++;
> + if ((j == 4) || (i == DSC_NUM_BUF_RANGES - 2)) {
> + DPU_REG_WRITE(hw, DSC_RC_BUF_THRESH_0 + idx + off,
> + data);
> + off += 4;
> + j = 0;
> + data = 0;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + off = 0;
> + for (i = 0; i < DSC_NUM_BUF_RANGES; i++) {
> + min_qp |= (rc[i].range_min_qp & 0x1f) << 5*j;
> + max_qp |= (rc[i].range_max_qp & 0x1f) << 5*j;
> + bpg_off |= (rc[i].range_bpg_offset & 0x3f) << 6*j;
These values _must_ already be masked to be useful in
drm_dsc_compute_rc_parameters(), no need to mask them again just like
the v1.1 block implementation.
> + j++;
> + if (j == 5) {
> + DPU_REG_WRITE(hw, DSC_RC_MIN_QP_0 + idx + off,
> + min_qp);
> + DPU_REG_WRITE(hw, DSC_RC_MAX_QP_0 + idx + off,
> + max_qp);
> + DPU_REG_WRITE(hw,
> + DSC_RC_RANGE_BPG_OFFSETS_0 + idx + off,
> + bpg_off);
> + off += 4;
> + j = 0;
> + min_qp = 0;
> + max_qp = 0;
> + bpg_off = 0;
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void dpu_hw_dsc_bind_pingpong_blk_1_2(
> + struct dpu_hw_dsc *hw_dsc,
> + bool enable,
> + const enum dpu_pingpong pp)
> +{
> + struct dpu_hw_blk_reg_map *hw;
> + int idx;
> + int mux_cfg = 0xF; /* Disabled */
Lowercase hex (and anywhere else if I skipped any).
> +
> + if (!hw_dsc)
> + return;
As with the v1.1 implementation, we don't check this, and your function
below also checks it (but it does not need to).
> + if (_dsc_subblk_offset(hw_dsc, DPU_DSC_CTL, &idx))
> + return;
> +
> + hw = &hw_dsc->hw;
> + if (enable)
> + mux_cfg = (pp - PINGPONG_0) & 0x7;
> +
> + DPU_REG_WRITE(hw, DSC_CTL + idx, mux_cfg);
> +}
> +
> +void dpu_dsc_1_2_setup_ops(struct dpu_hw_dsc_ops *ops,
> + const unsigned long features)
> +{
> + ops->dsc_disable = dpu_hw_dsc_disable_1_2;
> + ops->dsc_config = dpu_hw_dsc_config_1_2;
> + ops->dsc_config_thresh = dpu_hw_dsc_config_thresh_1_2;
> + ops->dsc_bind_pingpong_blk = dpu_hw_dsc_bind_pingpong_blk_1_2;
> +}
> --
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>
All in all you really need to revise and clean your patches before
sending them to the lists; these are already far too many comments and
nits, and massively take away from reviewing code behaviour which I have
not even started with after looking at 1 out of 14 patches :(
- Marijn