Re: [PATCH 2/4] f2fs: add sanity check for ipu_policy

[Chao Yu]

On 2023/1/20 21:40, Yangtao Li wrote:
> Disallow the value set beyond the range, and disallow to change
> the value in lfs mode.

IMO, it's better to merge this patch into 1/4.

> BTW, convert open code to use BIT().

How about using one patch to change 1 << xx to BIT(xx) for all cases
of f2fs rather than one by one?

Thanks,

> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   fs/f2fs/segment.h |  1 +
>   fs/f2fs/sysfs.c   | 11 ++++++++++-
>   2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.h b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> index 0b0eb8f03cba..d73e988566a5 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> @@ -681,6 +681,7 @@ enum {
>   	F2FS_IPU_ASYNC,
>   	F2FS_IPU_NOCACHE,
>   	F2FS_IPU_HONOR_OPU_WRITE,
> +	F2FS_IPU_MAX,
>   };
>   
>   #define F2FS_IPU_POLICY(name)					\
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> index bdc761f36310..576e6416ffb9 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> @@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ static ssize_t __sbi_store(struct f2fs_attr *a,
>   	if (ret < 0)
>   		return ret;
>   #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_FAULT_INJECTION
> -	if (a->struct_type == FAULT_INFO_TYPE && t >= (1 << FAULT_MAX))
> +	if (a->struct_type == FAULT_INFO_TYPE && t >= BIT(FAULT_MAX))
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   	if (a->struct_type == FAULT_INFO_RATE && t >= UINT_MAX)
>   		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -706,6 +706,15 @@ static ssize_t __sbi_store(struct f2fs_attr *a,
>   		return count;
>   	}
>   
> +	if (!strcmp(a->attr.name, "ipu_policy")) {
> +		if (F2FS_OPTION(sbi).fs_mode == FS_MODE_LFS)
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		if (t >= BIT(F2FS_IPU_MAX))
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		SM_I(sbi)->ipu_policy = (unsigned int)t;
> +		return count;
> +	}
> +
>   	*ui = (unsigned int)t;
>   
>   	return count;