Re: [PATCH v12 2/6] dt-bindings: thermal: mediatek: Add LVTS thermal controllers dt-binding definition

[Balsam CHIHI]

Hi Krzysztof,

Thank you for the feedback.

On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 11:48 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 26/01/2023 17:10, bchihi@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Balsam CHIHI <bchihi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Add LVTS thermal controllers dt-binding definition for mt8195.
>
> Subject: drop second/last, redundant "dt-binding definition". The
> "dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.

fixed.
The patch title has been fixed as you suggested :
"dt-bindings: thermal: mediatek: Add LVTS thermal controllers"

>
> Plus two comments at the end.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Balsam CHIHI <bchihi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Changelog:
> >   v12:
> >      - Fixed subject prefix
> >      - Fixed licences GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0
> >      - Added dual licenses
>
>
> > +    };
> > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/thermal/mediatek-lvts.h b/include/dt-bindings/thermal/mediatek-lvts.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..902d5b1e4f43
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/thermal/mediatek-lvts.h
>
> Same filename as bindings.

fixed.
rename :
include/dt-bindings/thermal/mediatek-lvts.h =>
include/dt-bindings/thermal/mediatek-lvts-thermal.h

>
> > @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 or MIT) */
>
> Although this is correct, any reason why not using exactly the same
> license as bindings?

fixed.
both files are now using the same license :
"SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 or MIT)"

>
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (c) 2023 MediaTek Inc.
> > + * Author: Balsam CHIHI <bchihi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > + */
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>

I'll send the changes soon.

Best regards,
Balsam