Re: [PATCH v1 03/11] clk: starfive: Add StarFive JH7110 System-Top-Group clock driver

[Stephen Boyd]

Quoting Xingyu Wu (2023-01-30 00:02:28)
> On 2023/1/26 10:33, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Xingyu Wu (2023-01-19 18:44:37)
> >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/starfive/clk-starfive-jh7110-stg.c b/drivers/clk/starfive/clk-starfive-jh7110-stg.c
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..c2740f44e796
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/drivers/clk/starfive/clk-starfive-jh7110-stg.c
[...]
> >> +                               parents[i].fw_name = "nocstg_bus";
> >> +                       else if (pidx == JH7110_STGCLK_APB_BUS)
> >> +                               parents[i].fw_name = "apb_bus";
> > 
> > Can this be an array lookup instead of a pile of conditions?
> > 
> >       if (pidx < JH7110_STGCLK_END)
> >               ...
> >       else
> >               parents[i].fw_name = fw_table[pidx - JH7110_STGCLK_END];
> > 
> > Or even better, don't use strings at all and just make the 'pidx' number
> > (possibly minus the end constant) be the 'clocks' property index that
> > you want.
> 
> It seen to be a good way that there uses an array.
> Based on the another way, can I use the 'pidx' number to get the 'clock-names' property
> to be the parent clock name?

The binding is your design. It is incorrect if the binding is referencing clocks
provided by the same node though. If that's the case, simply use the hw
pointer directly.

> 
> > 
> >> +               }
> >> +
> >> +               clk->hw.init = &init;
> >> +               clk->idx = idx;
> >> +               clk->max_div = max & JH71X0_CLK_DIV_MASK;
> >> +
> >> +               ret = devm_clk_hw_register(&pdev->dev, &clk->hw);
> >> +               if (ret)
> >> +                       return ret;
> >> +       }
> >> +
> >> +       ret = devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider(&pdev->dev, jh7110_stgclk_get, priv);
> >> +       if (ret)
> >> +               return ret;
> >> +
> >> +       return jh7110_reset_controller_register(priv, "reset-stg", 2);
> > 
> > Is this also devm-ified?
> 
> No, it need to be freed actively. I will advise Hal Feng this.
> 

Oh, that's not good.