Re: [PATCH] driver: bus: simple-pm-bus: Add Freescale i.MX8qm/qxp CSR compatible strings

[Liu Ying]

On Mon, 2023-01-30 at 09:13 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 11:49 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 29/01/2023 09:13, Liu Ying wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 13:45 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > > On 26/01/2023 03:54, Liu Ying wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 2023-01-25 at 10:05 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 9:31 AM Liu Ying <
> > > > > > victor.liu@xxxxxxx>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > Freescale i.MX8qm/qxp CSR module matches with what the
> > > > > > > simple
> > > > > > > power
> > > > > > > managed bus driver does, considering it needs an IPG
> > > > > > > clock to
> > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > enabled before accessing it's child devices, the child
> > > > > > > devices
> > > > > > > need
> > > > > > > to be populated by the CSR module and the child devices'
> > > > > > > power
> > > > > > > management operations need to be propagated to their
> > > > > > > parent
> > > > > > > devices.
> > > > > > > Add the CSR module's compatible strings to
> > > > > > > simple_pm_bus_of_match[]
> > > > > > > table to support the CSR module.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > Suggested-by: Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Liu Ying <victor.liu@xxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > The CSR module's dt-binding documentation can be found at
> > > > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/fsl,imx8qxp-
> > > > > > > csr.yaml.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Suggested by Rob and Lee in this thread:
> > > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpatchwork.kernel.org%2Fproject%2Flinux-arm-kernel%2Fpatch%2F20221017075702.4182846-1-victor.liu%40nxp.com%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cvictor.liu%40nxp.com%7C721a36c64fab482d5d3908db0299e1d8%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C638106632175447990%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=jnxUn2N33xjrmNfGXw02SeG5EN%2Fqluz%2BjZYRk0%2BHlrU%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >  drivers/bus/simple-pm-bus.c | 2 ++
> > > > > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/bus/simple-pm-bus.c
> > > > > > > b/drivers/bus/simple-
> > > > > > > pm-
> > > > > > > bus.c
> > > > > > > index 7afe1947e1c0..4a7575afe6c6 100644
> > > > > > > --- a/drivers/bus/simple-pm-bus.c
> > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/bus/simple-pm-bus.c
> > > > > > > @@ -120,6 +120,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id
> > > > > > > simple_pm_bus_of_match[] = {
> > > > > > >         { .compatible = "simple-mfd",   .data = ONLY_BUS
> > > > > > > },
> > > > > > >         { .compatible = "isa",          .data = ONLY_BUS
> > > > > > > },
> > > > > > >         { .compatible = "arm,amba-bus", .data = ONLY_BUS
> > > > > > > },
> > > > > > > +       { .compatible = "fsl,imx8qm-lvds-csr", },
> > > > > > > +       { .compatible = "fsl,imx8qxp-mipi-lvds-csr", },
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I did read the thread linked above, and I still think you
> > > > > > should
> > > > > > just
> > > > > > add "simple-pm-bus" to the compatible value in DTS, so no
> > > > > > driver
> > > > > > change
> > > > > > is needed, cfr.
> > > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/renesas,bsc.yaml.
> > > > 
> > > > I don't think we want to start putting specific compatibles
> > > > here. We
> > > > don't do it for simple-mfd, syscon and simple-bus, so neither
> > > > should
> > > > we
> > > > do it here.
> > > > 
> > > > > This means that i.MX8qm/qxp CSR module dt-binding
> > > > > documentation
> > > > > needs
> > > > > to be changed.  I'd like to know how Rob and Krzysztof think
> > > > > about
> > > > > that.
> > > > 
> > > > The fsl,imx8qxp-csr.yaml bindings are broken anyway... You have
> > > > device
> > > > specific bindings for non-simple device but use simple-mfd. You
> > > > cannot.
> > > > simple-mfd means it is simple and none of the resources are
> > > > needed
> > > > for
> > > > children, but that binding contradicts it.
> > > > 
> > > > Now you kind of try to extend it even more make it more and
> > > > more
> > > > broken.
> > > > 
> > > > Rework the bindings keeping them backwards compatible. The
> > > > combination
> > > > with simple-mfd should be deprecated and you can add whatever
> > > > is
> > > > needed
> > > > for a proper setup.
> > > 
> > > I did try to rework the bindings and make the combination with
> > > simple-
> > > mfd deprecated. However, it reminds me the problem that "simple-
> > > pm-bus"
> > > and "syscon" can not be in compatible string at the same time,
> > > otherwise, nodename should match '^syscon@[0-9a-f]+$' and
> > > '^bus@[0-9a-
> > > f]+$' at the same time. I mentioned the problem in the same
> > > thread[1]
> > > where Rob and Lee suggest to go with this patch. "syscon" is
> > > needed
> > > since i.MX8qxp MIPI DSI/LVDS combo PHY node references the CSR
> > > module
> > > through a phandle, so dropping/deprecating "syscon" is a no-go.
> > > 
> > > Also, as Rob mentioned in [1] "if register space is all mixed
> > > together,
> > > then it is the former and an MFD", I think the CSR module should
> > > fall
> > > into the simple-mfd category.
> > 
> > You are now mixing MFD with simple-mfd. If you have clocks there or
> > any
> > other resources, it's not simple-mfd anymore.
> 
> I beg to differ (but not w.r.t. the other resources): if any "glue"
> device
> between parent and child hierarchies does not call
> pm_runtime_enable(),
> Runtime PM (which is a Linux thing, not a DT thing) for the children
> may not work correctly, as it won't propagate correctly to the
> parent.
> So IMHO this is something to fix in Linux, not in DT.
> 
> > > Take i.MX8qxp MIPI DSI/LVDS CSR module as
> > > an example, child device pxl2dpi register offset is 0x40, while
> > > child
> > > device ldb register offsets are 0x20 and 0xe0.
> > > 
> > > Geert, Krzysztof, can you please consider to keep this patch as-
> > > is,
> > > since it seems that there is no other option?
> > 
> > There are other options, why do you say there is no? Making it
> > proper
> > binding/driver for its children without abusing simple bindings.
> > Simple
> > bindings are for simple cases and this turns out not the simple
> > case.
> 
> Or drop the ".data = ONLY_BUS" for "simple-mfd"?

Saravana said it's wrong to deleting ONLY_BUS for "simple-mfd". See
Saravana's comments in [1].

[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/CAGETcx_QVaYYHsD9HZmBu404K-oXRCPm4N4GRrYu4pGyw2DHbg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Regards,
Liu Ying

> (and treat "simple-bus" the same as "simple-pm-bus", too ;-)
> 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                         Geert
> 
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- 
> geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a
> hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something
> like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds