RE: [EXT] Re: [net-next PATCH] octeontx2-af: Removed unnecessary debug messages.

[Ratheesh Kannoth]

----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 09:25:56AM +0530, Ratheesh Kannoth wrote:
> From: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> NPC exact match feature is supported only on one silicon variant, 
> removed debug messages which print that this feature is not available 
> on all other silicon variants.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_hash.c | 12 
> ++----------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_hash.c 
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_hash.c
> index f69102d20c90..ad1374a12a40 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_hash.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_hash.c
> @@ -200,10 +200,8 @@ void npc_config_secret_key(struct rvu *rvu, int blkaddr)
>  	struct rvu_hwinfo *hw = rvu->hw;
>  	u8 intf;
>  
> -	if (!hwcap->npc_hash_extract) {
> -		dev_info(rvu->dev, "HW does not support secret key configuration\n");
> +	if (!hwcap->npc_hash_extract)
>  		return;
> -	}
>  
>  	for (intf = 0; intf < hw->npc_intfs; intf++) {
>  		rvu_write64(rvu, blkaddr, NPC_AF_INTFX_SECRET_KEY0(intf), @@ 
> -221,10 +219,8 @@ void npc_program_mkex_hash(struct rvu *rvu, int blkaddr)
>  	struct rvu_hwinfo *hw = rvu->hw;
>  	u8 intf;
>  
> -	if (!hwcap->npc_hash_extract) {
> -		dev_dbg(rvu->dev, "Field hash extract feature is not supported\n");
> +	if (!hwcap->npc_hash_extract)
>  		return;
> -	}
>  
>  	for (intf = 0; intf < hw->npc_intfs; intf++) {
>  		npc_program_mkex_hash_rx(rvu, blkaddr, intf); @@ -1854,16 +1850,12 
> @@ int rvu_npc_exact_init(struct rvu *rvu)
>  	/* Check exact match feature is supported */
>  	npc_const3 = rvu_read64(rvu, blkaddr, NPC_AF_CONST3);
>  	if (!(npc_const3 & BIT_ULL(62))) {
> -		dev_info(rvu->dev, "%s: No support for exact match support\n",
> -			 __func__);
>  		return 0;
>  	}

>You should remove () brackets here too.
Ratheesh ->  Sorry , I did not get you. We have more than one statement in this "if" loop. How can we remove brackets ?

>  
>  	/* Check if kex profile has enabled EXACT match nibble */
>  	cfg = rvu_read64(rvu, blkaddr, NPC_AF_INTFX_KEX_CFG(NIX_INTF_RX));
>  	if (!(cfg & NPC_EXACT_NIBBLE_HIT)) {
> -		dev_info(rvu->dev, "%s: NPC exact match nibble not enabled in KEX profile\n",
> -			 __func__);
>  		return 0;
>  	}

>Same comment.
Ratheesh -> same comment. 

>  
> --
> 2.25.1
>