Re: [PATCH 01/19] ASoC: amd: ps: create platform devices based on acp config

[Pierre-Louis Bossart]

> Yes Controller has ACPI scope. Under controller based on
> "mipi-sdw-manager-list" property manager instances will be created.
> Manager and Link terms are interchangeable.
> 
> Below is the sample DSDT file if we go with two ACPI companion
> devices.
> 
> Scope (\_SB.ACP)
>     {
> 
>         Device (SWC0)
>         {
>             Name (_ADR, 0x05)  // _ADR: Address
>         Name(_DSD, Package() {
>                                         ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
>                                         Package () {
>                                         Package (2) {"mipi-sdw-sw-interface-revision", 0x00010000},
>                                         Package (2) {"mipi-sdw-manager-list", 1}, // v 1.0
>                                         },
>                                         ToUUID("dbb8e3e6-5886-4ba6-8795-1319f52a966b"), // Hierarchical Extension
>                                         Package () {
>                                         Package (2) {"mipi-sdw-link-0-subproperties", "SWM0"},
>                                         }
>                                         }) // End _DSD
>         Name(SWM0, Package() {
>                                 ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
>                                 Package () {
>                                 Package (2) {"mipi-sdw-sw-interface-revision", 0x00010000},
>                                 // ... place holder for SWM0 additional properties
>                                 }
>                                 }) // End SWM0.SWM
> 
>     Device (SLV0) { // SoundWire Slave 0
>                         Name(_ADR, 0x000032025D131601)
>                   } // END SLV0   
> 
>         } // END SWC0
> 
>      Device (SWC1)
>         {
>             Name (_ADR, 0x09)  // _ADR: Address
>         Name(_DSD, Package() {
>                                         ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
>                                         Package () {
>                                         Package (2) {"mipi-sdw-sw-interface-revision", 0x00010000},
>                                         Package (2) {"mipi-sdw-manager-list", 1},
>                                         },
>                                         ToUUID("dbb8e3e6-5886-4ba6-8795-1319f52a966b"),
>                                         Package () {
>                                         Package (2) {"mipi-sdw-link-0-subproperties", "SWM0"},
>                                       
>                                         }
>                                         }) // End _DSD
>         Name(SWM0, Package() {
>                                 ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
>                                 Package () {
>                                 Package (2) {"mipi-sdw-sw-interface-revision", 0x00010000},
>                                 // ... place holder for SWM0 additional properties
>                                 }
>                                 }) // End SWM0.SWM
> 
>     Device (SLV0) { // SoundWire Slave 0
>                         Name(_ADR, 0x000032025D131601)
>                   } // END SLV0
> 
>         } // END SWC1
>     }
> }

that looks good to me.

> In above case, two manager instances will be created.
> When manager under SWC1 scope tries to add peripheral
> device, In sdw_slave_add() API its failing because peripheral
> device descriptor uses link id followed by 48bit encoded address.
> In above scenarios, both the manager's link id is zero only.

what fails exactly? The device_register() ?

If yes, what the issue. the device name?

I wonder if we need to use something like

"name shall be sdw:bus_id:link:mfg:part:class"

so as to uniquify the device name, if that was the problem.