Re: [PATCH net v4 1/3] ixgbe: allow to increase MTU to 3K with XDP enabled
From: Alexander H Duyck
Date: Wed Feb 08 2023 - 10:38:05 EST
On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 10:43 +0800, Jason Xing wrote:
> From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Recently I encountered one case where I cannot increase the MTU size
> directly from 1500 to a much bigger value with XDP enabled if the
> server is equipped with IXGBE card, which happened on thousands of
> servers in production environment. After appling the current patch,
> we can set the maximum MTU size to 3K.
>
> This patch follows the behavior of changing MTU as i40e/ice does.
>
> Referrences:
> [1] commit 23b44513c3e6 ("ice: allow 3k MTU for XDP")
> [2] commit 0c8493d90b6b ("i40e: add XDP support for pass and drop actions")
>
> Fixes: fabf1bce103a ("ixgbe: Prevent unsupported configurations with XDP")
> Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@xxxxxxxxxxx>
This is based on the broken premise that w/ XDP we are using a 4K page.
The ixgbe driver isn't using page pool and is therefore running on
different limitations. The ixgbe driver is only using 2K slices of the
4K page. In addition that is reduced to 1.5K to allow for headroom and
the shared info in the buffer.
Currently the only way a 3K buffer would work is if FCoE is enabled and
in that case the driver is using order 1 pages and still using the
split buffer approach.
Changing the MTU to more than 1.5K will allow multi-buffer frames which
would break things when you try to use XDP_REDIRECT or XDP_TX on frames
over 1.5K in size. For things like XDP_PASS, XDP_DROP, and XDP_ABORT it
should still work as long as you don't attempt to reach beyond the 1.5K
boundary.
Until this driver supports XDP multi-buffer I don't think you can
increase the MTU past 1.5K. If you are wanting a larger MTU you should
look at enabling XDP multi-buffer and then just drop the XDP
limitations entirely.
> ---
> v4:
> 1) use ':' instead of '-' for kdoc
>
> v3:
> 1) modify the titile and body message.
>
> v2:
> 1) change the commit message.
> 2) modify the logic when changing MTU size suggested by Maciej and Alexander.
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> index ab8370c413f3..25ca329f7d3c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> @@ -6777,6 +6777,18 @@ static void ixgbe_free_all_rx_resources(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
> ixgbe_free_rx_resources(adapter->rx_ring[i]);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * ixgbe_max_xdp_frame_size - returns the maximum allowed frame size for XDP
> + * @adapter: device handle, pointer to adapter
> + */
> +static int ixgbe_max_xdp_frame_size(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
> +{
> + if (PAGE_SIZE >= 8192 || adapter->flags2 & IXGBE_FLAG2_RX_LEGACY)
> + return IXGBE_RXBUFFER_2K;
> + else
> + return IXGBE_RXBUFFER_3K;
> +}
> +
There is no difference in the buffer allocation approach for LEGACY vs
non-legacy. The difference is if we are building the frame around the
buffer using build_skb or we are adding it as a frag and then copying
out the header.
> /**
> * ixgbe_change_mtu - Change the Maximum Transfer Unit
> * @netdev: network interface device structure
> @@ -6788,18 +6800,13 @@ static int ixgbe_change_mtu(struct net_device *netdev, int new_mtu)
> {
> struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
>
> - if (adapter->xdp_prog) {
> + if (ixgbe_enabled_xdp_adapter(adapter)) {
> int new_frame_size = new_mtu + ETH_HLEN + ETH_FCS_LEN +
> VLAN_HLEN;
> - int i;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < adapter->num_rx_queues; i++) {
> - struct ixgbe_ring *ring = adapter->rx_ring[i];
>
> - if (new_frame_size > ixgbe_rx_bufsz(ring)) {
> - e_warn(probe, "Requested MTU size is not supported with XDP\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> + if (new_frame_size > ixgbe_max_xdp_frame_size(adapter)) {
> + e_warn(probe, "Requested MTU size is not supported with XDP\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
> }
>