Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp-crd: Introduce pmic_glink

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 8.02.2023 19:00, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 05:40:44PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 8.02.2023 16:57, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 09:14:46AM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>> On 8.02.2023 04:46, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> [..]
>>>>>  &usb_0_dwc3 {
>>>>> -	/* TODO: Define USB-C connector properly */
>>>>>  	dr_mode = "host";
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	port {
>>>>> +		usb_0_role_switch: endpoint {
>>>>> +			remote-endpoint = <&pmic_glink_con0_hs>;
>>>>> +		};
>>>> This should be defined in the SoC DTSI, it's a standard dwc3 binding
>>>> with usb HS / SS / SBU ports. Especially since we can feed the endpoint
>>>> from any device now, as pmic-glink should work everywhere.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The sa8295p/sa8540p boards, derived from sc8280xp does not implement
>>> pmic_glink, so it seems moving this to the soc.dtsi would be messy.
>>>
>>>> Or /omit-if-no-ref/, I suppose.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Or you're saying I should put the skeleton of the port definition in the
>>> soc.dtsi and then fill it out the remote-endpoint here; and mark it
>>> omit-if-no-ref to avoid binding warnings?
>> I thought omit-if-no-ref actually omits the node before resolving phandles
>> that it references, but it seems to not be the case.. Still, we can define
>> the ports in the SoC DTSI and assign endpoints per-device (like we do with
>> DSI for example).
>>
> 
> You mean move the lines:
> 
> port {
> 	usb_0_role_switch: endpoint {
> 	};
> };
> 
> to sc8280xp.dtsi and then do:
> 
> &usb_0_role_switch {
> 	remote-endpoint = <&pmic_glink_con0_hs>;
> };
> 
> here?
Correct

Konrad
> 
> Regards,
> Bjorn