Re: [PATCH v10 1/6] userfaultfd: Add UFFD WP Async support
From: Peter Xu
Date: Wed Feb 08 2023 - 16:13:12 EST
On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 04:29:10PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> Add new WP Async mode (UFFD_FEATURE_WP_ASYNC) which resolves the page
> faults on its own. It can be used to track that which pages have been
> written-to from the time the pages were write-protected. It is very
> efficient way to track the changes as uffd is by nature pte/pmd based.
>
> UFFD synchronous WP sends the page faults to the userspace where the
> pages which have been written-to can be tracked. But it is not efficient.
> This is why this asynchronous version is being added. After setting the
> WP Async, the pages which have been written to can be found in the pagemap
> file or information can be obtained from the PAGEMAP_IOCTL.
>
> Suggested-by: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v10:
> - Build fix
> - Update comments and add error condition to return error from uffd
> register if hugetlb pages are present when wp async flag is set
>
> Changes in v9:
> - Correct the fault resolution with code contributed by Peter
>
> Changes in v7:
> - Remove UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT_MODE_ASYNC_WP and add UFFD_FEATURE_WP_ASYNC
> - Handle automatic page fault resolution in better way (thanks to Peter)
>
> update to wp async
>
> uffd wp async
> ---
> fs/userfaultfd.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
> include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h | 11 +++++++++++
> include/uapi/linux/userfaultfd.h | 10 +++++++++-
> mm/memory.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
> 4 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/userfaultfd.c b/fs/userfaultfd.c
> index 15a5bf765d43..422f2530c63e 100644
> --- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
> +++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
> @@ -1422,10 +1422,15 @@ static int userfaultfd_register(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
> goto out_unlock;
>
> /*
> - * Note vmas containing huge pages
> + * Note vmas containing huge pages. Hugetlb isn't supported
> + * with UFFD_FEATURE_WP_ASYNC.
> */
Need to set "ret = -EINVAL;" here. Or..
> - if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(cur))
> + if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(cur)) {
> + if (ctx->features & UFFD_FEATURE_WP_ASYNC)
> + goto out_unlock;
.. it'll return -EBUSY, which does not sound like the right errcode here.
> +
Drop this empty line?
> basic_ioctls = true;
> + }
>
> found = true;
> }
Other than that looks good, thanks.
--
Peter Xu