Re: [PATCH] tracing/selftests: Ignore __pfx_ symbols in kprobe test
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Thu Feb 09 2023 - 05:48:31 EST
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 05:03:04PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 19:05:08 +0100
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > This is assuming that kprobes can not be added on top of these. But another
> > > solution could be to have kprobes just pick the function the __pfx_ is for.
> > > Would that be a better solution?
> >
> > Simply refusing them is simplest. I don't see a compelling reason to
> > make this complicated.
>
> OK, so you are good with the patch as is then?
Yeah, but given I've no idea about the whole test thing or .tc files I
didn't ack.