[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 05/17] bpf, sockmap: Don't let sock_map_{close,destroy,unhash} call itself

[Sasha Levin]

From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 5b4a79ba65a1ab479903fff2e604865d229b70a9 ]

sock_map proto callbacks should never call themselves by design. Protect
against bugs like [1] and break out of the recursive loop to avoid a stack
overflow in favor of a resource leak.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/00000000000073b14905ef2e7401@xxxxxxxxxx/

Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230113-sockmap-fix-v2-1-1e0ee7ac2f90@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/core/sock_map.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/sock_map.c b/net/core/sock_map.c
index ae6013a8bce53..86b4e8909ad1e 100644
--- a/net/core/sock_map.c
+++ b/net/core/sock_map.c
@@ -1514,15 +1514,16 @@ void sock_map_unhash(struct sock *sk)
 	psock = sk_psock(sk);
 	if (unlikely(!psock)) {
 		rcu_read_unlock();
-		if (sk->sk_prot->unhash)
-			sk->sk_prot->unhash(sk);
-		return;
+		saved_unhash = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_prot)->unhash;
+	} else {
+		saved_unhash = psock->saved_unhash;
+		sock_map_remove_links(sk, psock);
+		rcu_read_unlock();
 	}
-
-	saved_unhash = psock->saved_unhash;
-	sock_map_remove_links(sk, psock);
-	rcu_read_unlock();
-	saved_unhash(sk);
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(saved_unhash == sock_map_unhash))
+		return;
+	if (saved_unhash)
+		saved_unhash(sk);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sock_map_unhash);
 
@@ -1535,17 +1536,18 @@ void sock_map_destroy(struct sock *sk)
 	psock = sk_psock_get(sk);
 	if (unlikely(!psock)) {
 		rcu_read_unlock();
-		if (sk->sk_prot->destroy)
-			sk->sk_prot->destroy(sk);
-		return;
+		saved_destroy = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_prot)->destroy;
+	} else {
+		saved_destroy = psock->saved_destroy;
+		sock_map_remove_links(sk, psock);
+		rcu_read_unlock();
+		sk_psock_stop(psock);
+		sk_psock_put(sk, psock);
 	}
-
-	saved_destroy = psock->saved_destroy;
-	sock_map_remove_links(sk, psock);
-	rcu_read_unlock();
-	sk_psock_stop(psock);
-	sk_psock_put(sk, psock);
-	saved_destroy(sk);
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(saved_destroy == sock_map_destroy))
+		return;
+	if (saved_destroy)
+		saved_destroy(sk);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sock_map_destroy);
 
@@ -1560,16 +1562,21 @@ void sock_map_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
 	if (unlikely(!psock)) {
 		rcu_read_unlock();
 		release_sock(sk);
-		return sk->sk_prot->close(sk, timeout);
+		saved_close = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_prot)->close;
+	} else {
+		saved_close = psock->saved_close;
+		sock_map_remove_links(sk, psock);
+		rcu_read_unlock();
+		sk_psock_stop(psock);
+		release_sock(sk);
+		cancel_work_sync(&psock->work);
+		sk_psock_put(sk, psock);
 	}
-
-	saved_close = psock->saved_close;
-	sock_map_remove_links(sk, psock);
-	rcu_read_unlock();
-	sk_psock_stop(psock);
-	release_sock(sk);
-	cancel_work_sync(&psock->work);
-	sk_psock_put(sk, psock);
+	/* Make sure we do not recurse. This is a bug.
+	 * Leak the socket instead of crashing on a stack overflow.
+	 */
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(saved_close == sock_map_close))
+		return;
 	saved_close(sk, timeout);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sock_map_close);
-- 
2.39.0