Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 3/4] lib/igt_kmod: add compatibility for KUnit

[Isabella Basso]

Hi, Janusz,

> Am 2023-02-10 um 11:56 AM schrieb Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> 
> Hi Isabella,
> 
> On Monday, 19 September 2022 22:55:44 CET Isabella Basso wrote:
>> Hi, Janusz,
>> 
>>> Am 09/09/2022 um 12:18 PM schrieb Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>> 
>>> ...
>>> 
>>> Anyway, related to my comment about naming that function a parser, I think the 
>>> best approach would be for that parser to return a generic set of results from 
>>> kunit execution, then we could feed that data into an IGT specific handler 
>>> that would convert them to IGT results (SUCCESS, FAIL, or SKIP) as if returned 
>>> by a set of IGT dynamic subtests.
>> 
>> That sounds like a good idea to me, I might take some extra time before v3 to
>> do that, though. 
> 
> Were you able to make any progress?  Do you need any help?

I’ve already handled most common cases but I still have to address Chehab’s comments — specifically in what concerns crashes. I’ve been doing most of the development by myself as GSoC has ended so I’m taking my time on this.

My most up-to-date work is available at [1], so if you have any suggestions as to what might be done I’d love to hear them before sending out v3 to the mailing list.

[1] - https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/isinyaaa/igt-gpu-tools/-/merge_requests/1

Cheers,
--
Isabella Basso

> Thanks,
> Janusz
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "KUnit Development" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kunit-dev+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kunit-dev/7621786.lvqk35OSZv%40jkrzyszt-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com.