@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ MX8MM_IOMUXC_SD2_DATA1_USDHC2_DATA1 0x1d6
MX8MM_IOMUXC_SD2_DATA2_USDHC2_DATA2 0x1d6
MX8MM_IOMUXC_SD2_DATA3_USDHC2_DATA3 0x1d6
MX8MM_IOMUXC_SD2_CD_B_GPIO2_IO12 0x019
- MX8MM_IOMUXC_GPIO1_IO04_USDHC2_VSELECT 0x1d0
+ MX8MM_IOMUXC_GPIO1_IO04_USDHC2_VSELECT 0x400001d0
The VSELECT pin should be driven by the (u)sdhc core...
>;
};
};
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-osm-s.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-osm-s.dtsi
index 5172883717d1..90daaf54e704 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-osm-s.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-osm-s.dtsi
@@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ reg_nvcc_sd: LDO5 {
regulator-name = "NVCC_SD (LDO5)";
regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
+ sd-vsel-gpios = <&gpio1 4 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
and by using the sd-vsel-gpios property the IOMUXC_GPIO1_IO04 have to be
muxed as GPIO, which is not the case. So I think that u-boot have a bug
within the (u)sdhc core.