Re: [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/timer-mediatek: Make timer-mediatek become loadable module

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 14/02/2023 12:06, Walter Chang (張維哲) wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-02-10 at 11:07 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 10/02/2023 11:00, walter.chang@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>> From: Chun-Hung Wu <chun-hung.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> This patch makes the timer-mediatek driver which can
>>
>> Do not use "This commit/patch".
>>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17.1/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst*L95__;Iw!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!g1yigOO6iIpjlr82Ud0dn1yVP_1yqSfLWJ-1GFC7O88n7l7lrb9SlYAw5KHzA3339zyiV-s72Wn_OZrARjlaY0RMmdnOUyQ$ ;
>>  
>>
>>> register an always-on timer as tick_broadcast_device
>>> on MediaTek SoCs become loadable module in GKI.
>>
>> Are you planning to answer other parts of that discussion? IOW, does
>> the
>> system boot fine? What's the impact of this being a module?
>>
>>>
>>> This patch depends on the previous patch.
>>>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230208094813.20874-1-walter.chang@xxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#t
>>
>> This does not belong to commit msg. What's the point of keeping it in
>> commit history forever?
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chun-Hung Wu <chun-hung.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/clocksource/Kconfig          |  2 +-
>>>  drivers/clocksource/timer-mediatek.c | 43
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
>>> b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
>>> index 4469e7f555e9..41345827055b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
>>> @@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ config SYS_SUPPORTS_SH_CMT
>>>  	bool
>>>  
>>>  config MTK_TIMER
>>> -	bool "Mediatek timer driver" if COMPILE_TEST
>>> +	tristate "Mediatek timer driver"
>>>  	depends on HAS_IOMEM
>>>  	select TIMER_OF
>>>  	select CLKSRC_MMIO
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-mediatek.c
>>> b/drivers/clocksource/timer-mediatek.c
>>> index d5b29fd03ca2..806044ef391c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-mediatek.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-mediatek.c
>>> @@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
>>>  #include <linux/clocksource.h>
>>>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>>>  #include <linux/irqreturn.h>
>>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>>> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>>  #include <linux/sched_clock.h>
>>>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>>>  #include "timer-of.h"
>>> @@ -450,6 +453,46 @@ static int __init mtk_gpt_init(struct
>>> device_node *node)
>>>  
>>>  	return 0;
>>>  }
>>> +
>>> +#ifdef MODULE
>>> +static int mtk_timer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> +{
>>> +	int (*timer_init)(struct device_node *node);
>>> +	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>>> +
>>> +	timer_init = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
>>> +	return timer_init(np);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static const struct of_device_id mtk_timer_match_table[] = {
>>> +	{
>>> +		.compatible = "mediatek,mt6577-timer",
>>> +		.data = mtk_gpt_init,
>>> +	},
>>> +	{
>>> +		.compatible = "mediatek,mt6765-timer",
>>> +		.data = mtk_syst_init,
>>> +	},
>>> +	{
>>> +		.compatible = "mediatek,mt6795-systimer",
>>> +		.data = mtk_cpux_init,
>>> +	},
>>> +	{}
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static struct platform_driver mtk_timer_driver = {
>>> +	.probe = mtk_timer_probe,
>>> +	.driver = {
>>> +		.name = "mtk-timer",
>>> +		.of_match_table = mtk_timer_match_table,
>>> +	},
>>> +};
>>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("MEDIATEK Module Timer driver");
>>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>>
>> I don't think you run checkpatch before sending... please do not use
>> humans for review which is done by automatic tools.
>>
>>> +
>>> +module_platform_driver(mtk_timer_driver);
>>
>> Follow coding convention like in very other driver, so this goes
>> immediately after definition of driver structure.
>>
>>> +#else
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
> 
> Thanks for pointing out the mistake. I have fixed it and submitted 
> patch v2, which merged the driver and export functions in the same
> patch.
> 
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230214105412.5856-1-walter.chang@xxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#t

My other questions are unanswered.

Best regards,
Krzysztof