Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] dt-bindings: Add RISC-V misaligned access performance

From: Conor Dooley
Date: Tue Feb 14 2023 - 16:27:25 EST


On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 12:14:53PM -0800, Evan Green wrote:
> From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This key allows device trees to specify the performance of misaligned
> accesses to main memory regions from each CPU in the system.
>
> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> (no changes since v1)
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml
> index c6720764e765..2c09bd6f2927 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml
> @@ -85,6 +85,21 @@ properties:
> $ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string"
> pattern: ^rv(?:64|32)imaf?d?q?c?b?v?k?h?(?:_[hsxz](?:[a-z])+)*$
>
> + riscv,misaligned-access-performance:
> + description:
> + Identifies the performance of misaligned memory accesses to main memory
> + regions. There are three flavors of unaligned access performance: "emulated"

Is the performance: emulated the source of the dt_binding_check issues?
And the fix is as simple as:
- description:
+ description: |
?

> + means that misaligned accesses are emulated via software and thus
> + extremely slow, "slow" means that misaligned accesses are supported by
> + hardware but still slower that aligned accesses sequences, and "fast"
> + means that misaligned accesses are as fast or faster than the
> + cooresponding aligned accesses sequences.
> + $ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string"
> + enum:
> + - emulated
> + - slow
> + - fast
> +
> # RISC-V requires 'timebase-frequency' in /cpus, so disallow it here
> timebase-frequency: false
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature