Re: linux-next: manual merge of the v4l-dvb-next tree with the arm-soc tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 09:45:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the v4l-dvb-next tree got conflicts in:
> 
>   drivers/media/platform/ti/davinci/vpbe_display.c
>   drivers/media/platform/ti/davinci/vpbe_osd.c
>   drivers/media/platform/ti/davinci/vpbe_venc.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   eeee69739353 ("media: davinci: remove vpbe support")
> 
> from the arm-soc tree and commits:
> 
>   eb78ca6a0496 ("media: ti/davinci: vpbe_osd: Drop empty platform remove function")
>   5204a5dce04b ("media: ti/davinci: vpbe_venc: Drop empty platform remove function")
>   0d3732fb1b20 ("media: ti: davinci: vpbe_display.c: return 0 instead of 'ret'.")
> 
> from the v4l-dvb-next tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I removed the files) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.

This is now a conflict between the arm-soc tree and the v4l-dvb tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachment: pgpxV_7bT5JIB.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature