On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 19:54:29 +0800
Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Since the following commit:
commit f66c0447cca1 ("kprobes: Set unoptimized flag after unoptimizing code")
modified the update timing of the KPROBE_FLAG_OPTIMIZED, a optimized_kprobe
may be in the optimizing or unoptimizing state when op.kp->flags
has KPROBE_FLAG_OPTIMIZED and op->list is not empty.
The __recover_optprobed_insn check logic is incorrect, a kprobe in the
unoptimizing state may be incorrectly determined as unoptimizing.
As a result, incorrect instructions are copied.
Ah, good catch!
The optprobe_queued_unopt function needs to be exported for invoking in
arch directory.
Fixes: f66c0447cca1 ("kprobes: Set unoptimized flag after unoptimizing code")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/opt.c | 4 ++--
include/linux/kprobes.h | 1 +
kernel/kprobes.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/opt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/opt.c
index e57e07b0edb6..3718d6863555 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/opt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/opt.c
@@ -46,8 +46,8 @@ unsigned long __recover_optprobed_insn(kprobe_opcode_t *buf, unsigned long addr)
/* This function only handles jump-optimized kprobe */
if (kp && kprobe_optimized(kp)) {
op = container_of(kp, struct optimized_kprobe, kp);
- /* If op->list is not empty, op is under optimizing */
- if (list_empty(&op->list))
+ /* If op is [un]optimized or under unoptimizing */
Hmm, this is a bit confusing comment. If it is unoptimized, the kprobe_optimized() returns false.
Thus the comment should be /* If op is optimized or under unoptimizing */.