On 2/7/2023 11:58 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 13:15:36 +0100 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
The forward declaration was introduced with a prototype that does
not match the function definition:
drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-phy-v2.c:2166:13: error: conflicting types for 'xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange' due to enum/integer mismatch; have 'void(struct xgbe_prv_data *, enum xgbe_mb_cmd, enum xgbe_mb_subcmd)' [-Werror=enum-int-mismatch]
2166 | static void xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-phy-v2.c:391:13: note: previous declaration of 'xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange' with type 'void(struct xgbe_prv_data *, unsigned int, unsigned int)'
391 | static void xgbe_phy_perform_ratechange(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thanks for the fix. What's the compiler / extra flags you're using?
Doesn't pop up on our setups..
Yes please. Even this does not pop on our build systems too. Would like
to know those extra compiler flags.
Thanks,
Shyam