Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ext4: commit super block if fs record error when journal record without error

From: yebin (H)
Date: Thu Feb 16 2023 - 20:45:06 EST




On 2023/2/17 1:31, Jan Kara wrote:
On Tue 14-02-23 10:29:04, Ye Bin wrote:
From: Ye Bin <yebin10@xxxxxxxxxx>

Now, 'es->s_state' maybe covered by recover journal. And journal errno
maybe not recorded in journal sb as IO error. ext4_update_super() only
update error information when 'sbi->s_add_error_count' large than zero.
Then 'EXT4_ERROR_FS' flag maybe lost.
To solve above issue commit error information after recover journal.

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ext4/super.c | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index dc3907dff13a..b94754ba8556 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -5932,6 +5932,18 @@ static int ext4_load_journal(struct super_block *sb,
goto err_out;
}
+ if (unlikely(es->s_error_count && !jbd2_journal_errno(journal) &&
+ !(le16_to_cpu(es->s_state) & EXT4_ERROR_FS))) {
+ EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mount_state |= EXT4_ERROR_FS;
+ es->s_state |= cpu_to_le16(EXT4_ERROR_FS);
+ err = ext4_commit_super(sb);
+ if (err) {
+ ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR,
+ "Failed to commit error information, please repair fs force!");
+ goto err_out;
+ }
+ }
+
Hum, I'm not sure I follow here. If journal replay has overwritten the
superblock (and thus the stored error info), then I'd expect
es->s_error_count got overwritten (possibly to 0) as well. And this is
actually relatively realistic scenario with errors=remount-ro behavior when
the first fs error happens.

What I intended in my original suggestion was to save es->s_error_count,
es->s_state & EXT4_ERROR_FS, es->s_first_error_*, es->s_last_error_* before
doing journal replay in ext4_load_journal() and then after journal replay
merge this info back to the superblock
Actually,commit 1c13d5c08728 ("ext4: Save error information to the superblock for analysis")
already merged error info back to the superblock after journal replay except 'es->s_state'.
The problem I have now is that the error flag in the journal superblock was not recorded,
but the error message was recorded in the superblock. So it leads to ext4_clear_journal_err()
does not detect errors and marks the file system as an error. Because ext4_update_super() is
only set error flag when 'sbi->s_add_error_count > 0'. Although 'sbi->s_mount_state' is
written to the super block when umount, but it is also conditional.
So I handle the scenario "es->s_error_count && !jbd2_journal_errno(journal) &&
!(le16_to_cpu(es->s_state) & EXT4_ERROR_FS)". Maybe we can just store
'EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mount_state & EXT4_ERROR_FS' back to the superblock. But i
prefer to mark fs as error if it contain detail error info without EXT4_ERROR_FS.
- if EXT4_ERROR_FS was set, set it
now as well, take max of old and new s_error_count, set s_first_error_* if
it is now unset, set s_last_error_* if stored timestamp is newer than
current timestamp.

Or am I overengineering it now? :)

Honza