Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: lan966x: Use automatic selection of VCAP rule actionset
From: Horatiu Vultur
Date: Fri Feb 17 2023 - 03:09:07 EST
The 02/16/2023 14:54, Larysa Zaremba wrote:
Hi Larysa,
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 01:29:07PM +0100, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> > Since commit 81e164c4aec5 ("net: microchip: sparx5: Add automatic
> > selection of VCAP rule actionset") the VCAP API has the capability to
> > select automatically the actionset based on the actions that are attached
> > to the rule. So it is not needed anymore to hardcore the actionset in the
>
> I am sure, you've meant 'hardcode'
Yes, I will change this in the next version.
>
> > driver, therefore it is OK to remove this.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > v1->v2:
> > - improve the commit message by mentioning the commit which allows
> > to make this change
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_tc_flower.c | 2 --
> > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_tc_flower.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_tc_flower.c
> > index bd10a71897418..f960727ecaeec 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_tc_flower.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_tc_flower.c
> > @@ -261,8 +261,6 @@ static int lan966x_tc_flower_add(struct lan966x_port *port,
> > 0);
> > err |= vcap_rule_add_action_u32(vrule, VCAP_AF_MASK_MODE,
> > LAN966X_PMM_REPLACE);
> > - err |= vcap_set_rule_set_actionset(vrule,
> > - VCAP_AFS_BASE_TYPE);
>
> Is this the only location, where this can be done? I'm not very familiar with
> this driver, would it maybe make sense to check out lan966x_ptp_add_trap() too?
Good catch! Also in lan966x_ptp_add_trap, the function
vcap_set_rule_set_actionset can be removed.
>
> > if (err)
> > goto out;
> >
> > --
> > 2.38.0
> >
--
/Horatiu