Re: [PATCH] wifi: wfx: Remove some dead code

From: Christophe JAILLET
Date: Fri Feb 17 2023 - 14:51:34 EST


Le 15/02/2023 à 14:23, Jérôme Pouiller a écrit :
Hello Christophe,

On Wednesday 15 February 2023 13:34:37 CET Christophe JAILLET wrote:

wait_for_completion_timeout() can not return a <0 value.
So simplify the logic and remove dead code.

-ERESTARTSYS can not be returned by do_wait_for_common() for tasks with
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, which is the case for wait_for_completion_timeout()

Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/wireless/silabs/wfx/main.c | 10 +++-------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/silabs/wfx/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/silabs/wfx/main.c
index 6b9864e478ac..0b50f7058bbb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/silabs/wfx/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/silabs/wfx/main.c
@@ -358,13 +358,9 @@ int wfx_probe(struct wfx_dev *wdev)

wfx_bh_poll_irq(wdev);
err = wait_for_completion_timeout(&wdev->firmware_ready, 1 * HZ);
- if (err <= 0) {
- if (err == 0) {
- dev_err(wdev->dev, "timeout while waiting for startup indication\n");
- err = -ETIMEDOUT;
- } else if (err == -ERESTARTSYS) {
- dev_info(wdev->dev, "probe interrupted by user\n");

This code is ran during modprobe/insmod. We would like to allow the user
to interrupt (Ctrl+C) the probing if something is going wrong with the
device.

So, the real issue is wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout() should
be used instead of wait_for_completion_timeout().

Hmmm, not that clear.

See commit 01088cd143a9.

Let me know if you prefer this patch as-is or if 01088cd143a9 should be reverted.

CJ


(By reading this code again, it also seems the test "if (err <= 0)" is
useless)