RE: [PATCH 2/4] ASoC: sh: rz-ssi: Update interrupt handling for half duplex channels
From: Biju Das
Date: Sat Feb 18 2023 - 03:15:31 EST
Hi Prabhakar,
Thanks for the patch.
> Subject: [PATCH 2/4] ASoC: sh: rz-ssi: Update interrupt handling for half
> duplex channels
>
> From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> For half duplex channels we dont have separate interrupts for Tx and Rx
> instead we have single interrupt Rt (where the signal for Rx and Tx is
> muxed). To handle such a case install a handler in case we have a dma_rt
> interrupt specified in the DT for the PIO mode.
>
> Note, for backward compatibility we check if the Rx and Tx interrupts are
> present first instead of checking Rt interrupt.
Just a thought,
As dt-binding doc mentions, a way to distinguish half duplex and full duplex by
Counting the number of interrupts. Maybe we could use that property for
detecting channel with full/half duplex mode.
See below
>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> sound/soc/sh/rz-ssi.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/sh/rz-ssi.c b/sound/soc/sh/rz-ssi.c index
> 5d6bae33ae34..d502aa55c5a8 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/sh/rz-ssi.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/sh/rz-ssi.c
> @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ struct rz_ssi_priv {
> int irq_int;
> int irq_tx;
> int irq_rx;
> + int irq_rt;
>
> spinlock_t lock;
>
> @@ -565,6 +566,17 @@ static irqreturn_t rz_ssi_interrupt(int irq, void
> *data)
> rz_ssi_reg_mask_setl(ssi, SSIFSR, SSIFSR_RDF, 0);
> }
>
> + if (irq == ssi->irq_rt) {
> + struct snd_pcm_substream *substream = strm->substream;
> +
> + if (rz_ssi_stream_is_play(ssi, substream)) {
> + strm->transfer(ssi, &ssi->playback);
> + } else {
> + strm->transfer(ssi, &ssi->capture);
> + rz_ssi_reg_mask_setl(ssi, SSIFSR, SSIFSR_RDF, 0);
> + }
> + }
> +
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> @@ -993,26 +1005,39 @@ static int rz_ssi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (!rz_ssi_is_dma_enabled(ssi)) {
Here, Detect Half duplex or full duplex by counting number of interrupts.
If half duplex get IRQ associated with dma_rt
If full duplex get IRQ associated with dma_rx and dma_tx.
> /* Tx and Rx interrupts (pio only) */
> ssi->irq_tx = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "dma_tx");
> - if (ssi->irq_tx < 0)
> - return ssi->irq_tx;
> -
> - ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, ssi->irq_tx,
> - &rz_ssi_interrupt, 0,
> - dev_name(&pdev->dev), ssi);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret,
> - "irq request error (dma_tx)\n");
> -
> ssi->irq_rx = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "dma_rx");
> - if (ssi->irq_rx < 0)
> - return ssi->irq_rx;
> -
> - ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, ssi->irq_rx,
> - &rz_ssi_interrupt, 0,
> - dev_name(&pdev->dev), ssi);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret,
> - "irq request error (dma_rx)\n");
> + if (ssi->irq_tx == -ENXIO && ssi->irq_rx == -ENXIO) {
> + ssi->irq_rt = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "dma_rt");
> + if (ssi->irq_rt < 0)
> + return ssi->irq_rt;
> +
> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, ssi->irq_rt,
> + &rz_ssi_interrupt, 0,
> + dev_name(&pdev->dev), ssi);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret,
> + "irq request error (dma_tx)\n");
Typo dma_rt??
Cheers,
Biju
> + } else {
> + if (ssi->irq_tx < 0)
> + return ssi->irq_tx;
> +
> + if (ssi->irq_rx < 0)
> + return ssi->irq_rx;
> +
> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, ssi->irq_tx,
> + &rz_ssi_interrupt, 0,
> + dev_name(&pdev->dev), ssi);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret,
> + "irq request error (dma_tx)\n");
> +
> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, ssi->irq_rx,
> + &rz_ssi_interrupt, 0,
> + dev_name(&pdev->dev), ssi);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret,
> + "irq request error (dma_rx)\n");
> + }
> }
>
> ssi->rstc = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> --
> 2.25.1