[PATCH 05/17] block, bfq: Update bfqd->max_budget with bfqd->lock held

[Kemeng Shi]

bfq_max_budget and bfq_user_max_budget maybe be in inconsisten state if
bfq_max_budget configuration and bfq_max_budget auto-update happen
concurrently.
Example sequence:
config                          auto-update
bfqd->bfq_max_budget =
  __data
                                if (bfqd->bfq_user_max_budget == 0)
                                  bfqd->bfq_max_budget =
                                    bfq_calc_max_budget(bfqd);
bfqd->bfq_user_max_budget =
  __data;

Users may set bfq_max_budget successfully while read a different value
from they set.
bfq_max_budget is only update in update_thr_responsiveness_params and
configuration code. As update_thr_responsiveness_params is always called
under bfqd->lock, fix this by holding lock in configuration code.

Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 block/bfq-iosched.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index edbf5c9aeb47..5b08711cbaf6 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -7489,6 +7489,7 @@ static ssize_t bfq_max_budget_store(struct elevator_queue *e,
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	spin_lock_irq(&bfqd->lock);
 	if (__data == 0)
 		bfqd->bfq_max_budget = bfq_calc_max_budget(bfqd);
 	else {
@@ -7498,6 +7499,7 @@ static ssize_t bfq_max_budget_store(struct elevator_queue *e,
 	}
 
 	bfqd->bfq_user_max_budget = __data;
+	spin_unlock_irq(&bfqd->lock);
 
 	return count;
 }
@@ -7523,8 +7525,11 @@ static ssize_t bfq_timeout_sync_store(struct elevator_queue *e,
 		__data = INT_MAX;
 
 	bfqd->bfq_timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(__data);
+
+	spin_lock_irq(&bfqd->lock);
 	if (bfqd->bfq_user_max_budget == 0)
 		bfqd->bfq_max_budget = bfq_calc_max_budget(bfqd);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&bfqd->lock);
 
 	return count;
 }
-- 
2.30.0