Re: [PATCH v16 0/9] RISC-V IPI Improvements

[Marc Zyngier]

On 2023-02-15 03:17, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Feb 2023 03:04:14 PST (-0800), Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Tue, 03 Jan 2023 14:12:12 +0000,
> > Anup Patel <apatel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > This series aims to improve IPI support in Linux RISC-V in following 
> > > ways:
> > >  1) Treat IPIs as normal per-CPU interrupts instead of having custom 
> > > RISC-V
> > >     specific hooks. This also makes Linux RISC-V IPI support aligned 
> > > with
> > >     other architectures.
> > >  2) Remote TLB flushes and icache flushes should prefer local IPIs 
> > > instead
> > >     of SBI calls whenever we have specialized hardware (such as 
> > > RISC-V AIA
> > >     IMSIC and RISC-V SWI) which allows S-mode software to directly 
> > > inject
> > >     IPIs without any assistance from M-mode runtime firmware.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > I'm queuing patches 3 and 9 via the irqchip tree as they are
> > standalone.
> >
> > For the rest, I need an Ack from the riscv maintainers as they change
> > a large amount of arch-specific code, and the couple of irqchip
> > patches depend on these changes.
> >
> > Palmer, Paul?
>
> I haven't gotten time to give this a proper review, but I think we've
> got enough of a mess with our interrupt handling that it doesn't
> really matter so
>
> Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> if you want to take it for this cycle that's fine with me, but I'm
> also fine holding off so it can have a while to bake in linux-next --
> there's no real rush for any of this, as there's no hardware yet.

Letting this sort of things simmering in -next is the way.

Now that the basic dependencies are on their way, I'd expect this to be
rebased on 6.3-rc1, and we can then put the whole thing in -next.

Thanks,

        M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...