Re: [PATCH 1/5] MAINTAINERS: Add scripts/pahole-flags.sh to BPF section

[Matthias Männich]

On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 11:26 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 11:21:39AM +0000, maennich@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Currently, scripts/pahole-flags.sh has no formal maintainer. Add it to
> > the BPF section so that patches to it can be properly reviewed and
> > picked up.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220201205624.652313-2-nathan@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Signed-off-by: Matthias Maennich <maennich@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index 4f50a453e18a..176485e625a0 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -3407,6 +3407,7 @@ F:      net/sched/act_bpf.c
> >  F:   net/sched/cls_bpf.c
> >  F:   samples/bpf/
> >  F:   scripts/bpf_doc.py
> > +F:   scripts/pahole-flags.sh
> >  F:   tools/bpf/
> >  F:   tools/lib/bpf/
> >  F:   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/
> > --
> > 2.39.2.637.g21b0678d19-goog
> >
>
> No need for MAINTAINERS updates for older kernels as no one should be
> making new patches against them, right?

This one is optional, but it makes the next one apply cleanly and I
picked the entire series.

Cheers,
Matthias

>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h