Re: [PATCH 1/2] lib/test_bitmap: increment failure counter properly

[Yury Norov]

On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 12:55:05AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 01:45:23PM -0800, Yury Norov wrote:
> > The tests that don't use expect_eq() macro to determine that a test is
> > failured must increment failed_tests explicitly.
> 
> ...
> 
> >  			pr_err("bitmap_copy_arr32(nbits == %d:"
> >  				" tail is not safely cleared: %d\n",
> 
> Usually we don't split string literals (since checkpatch doesn't complain on a
> looong lines with them at the end of the line),
> 
> ...
> 
> >  			pr_err("bitmap_copy_arr64(nbits == %d:"
> >  				" tail is not safely cleared: %d\n", nbits, next_bit);
> 
> Ditto.
> 
> P.S. Seems a material for another patch.

If you're OK with this patch, can you give your review tag please?

Thanks,
Yury