Re: [PATCH v7 2/5] mips: dts: ralink: mt7621: rename watchdog node from 'wdt' into 'watchdog'

[Thomas Bogendoerfer]

On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 05:44:21AM +0100, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 4:12 PM Sergio Paracuellos
> <sergio.paracuellos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 4:11 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 11:39:33AM +0100, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> > > > Watchdog nodes must use 'watchdog' for node name. When a 'make dtbs_check'
> > > > is performed the following warning appears:
> > > >
> > > > wdt@100: $nodename:0: 'wdt@100' does not match '^watchdog(@.*|-[0-9a-f])?$'
> > > >
> > > > Fix this warning up properly renaming the node into 'watchdog'.
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Note that we can not apply this and the next patch of the series
> > > through the watchdog tree since it crosses a maintainer boundary.
> >
> > I was expecting Thomas to get these two arch/mips patches or get an
> > Acked-by from him in order for you to apply them.
> 
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> I think you have missed this series since you have started to apply
> newer stuff in mips-next. Are you ok with taking or Acking patches 2
> and 3 of this series?

yes, I sort of missed it. If it's enough to take patch 2/3 I'll do that.
If it's better to keep the series, I'm also ok with acking them.
What's the best way forward ?

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]