Re: [PATCH 2/3] migrate_pages: move split folios processing out of migrate_pages_batch()

From: Huang, Ying
Date: Wed Mar 01 2023 - 01:36:57 EST

Next message: Ojaswin Mujoo: "Re: [PATCH v4 8/9] ext4: Use rbtrees to manage PAs instead of inode i_prealloc_list"
Previous message: Tao Zhang: "Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] coresight-tpdm: Add reset node to TPDM node"
Next in thread: Baolin Wang: "Re: [PATCH 2/3] migrate_pages: move split folios processing out of migrate_pages_batch()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 2/24/2023 10:11 PM, Huang Ying wrote:
>> To simplify the code logic and reduce the line number.
>> Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: "Xu, Pengfei" <pengfei.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
>> Cc: Stefan Roesch <shr@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Xin Hao <xhao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> mm/migrate.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
>> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
>> index 7ac37dbbf307..91198b487e49 100644
>> --- a/mm/migrate.c
>> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
>> @@ -1605,9 +1605,10 @@ static int migrate_hugetlbs(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
>> static int migrate_pages_batch(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
>> free_page_t put_new_page, unsigned long private,
>> enum migrate_mode mode, int reason, struct list_head *ret_folios,
>> - struct migrate_pages_stats *stats)
>> + struct list_head *split_folios, struct migrate_pages_stats *stats,
>> + int nr_pass)
>> {
>> - int retry;
>> + int retry = 1;
>> int large_retry = 1;
>> int thp_retry = 1;
>> int nr_failed = 0;
>> @@ -1617,19 +1618,12 @@ static int migrate_pages_batch(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
>> bool is_large = false;
>> bool is_thp = false;
>> struct folio *folio, *folio2, *dst = NULL, *dst2;
>> - int rc, rc_saved, nr_pages;
>> - LIST_HEAD(split_folios);
>> + int rc, rc_saved = 0, nr_pages;
>> LIST_HEAD(unmap_folios);
>> LIST_HEAD(dst_folios);
>> bool nosplit = (reason == MR_NUMA_MISPLACED);
>> - bool no_split_folio_counting = false;
>> -retry:
>> - rc_saved = 0;
>> - retry = 1;
>> - for (pass = 0;
>> - pass < NR_MAX_MIGRATE_PAGES_RETRY && (retry || large_retry);
>> - pass++) {
>> + for (pass = 0; pass < nr_pass && (retry || large_retry); pass++) {
>> retry = 0;
>> large_retry = 0;
>> thp_retry = 0;
>> @@ -1660,7 +1654,7 @@ static int migrate_pages_batch(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
>> if (!thp_migration_supported() && is_thp) {
>> nr_large_failed++;
>> stats->nr_thp_failed++;
>> - if (!try_split_folio(folio, &split_folios)) {
>> + if (!try_split_folio(folio, split_folios)) {
>> stats->nr_thp_split++;
>> continue;
>> }
>> @@ -1692,7 +1686,7 @@ static int migrate_pages_batch(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
>> stats->nr_thp_failed += is_thp;
>> /* Large folio NUMA faulting doesn't split to retry. */
>> if (!nosplit) {
>> - int ret = try_split_folio(folio, &split_folios);
>> + int ret = try_split_folio(folio, split_folios);
>> if (!ret) {
>> stats->nr_thp_split += is_thp;
>> @@ -1709,18 +1703,11 @@ static int migrate_pages_batch(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
>> break;
>> }
>> }
>> - } else if (!no_split_folio_counting) {
>> + } else {
>> nr_failed++;
>> }
>> stats->nr_failed_pages += nr_pages +
>> nr_retry_pages;
>> - /*
>> - * There might be some split folios of fail-to-migrate large
>> - * folios left in split_folios list. Move them to ret_folios
>> - * list so that they could be put back to the right list by
>> - * the caller otherwise the folio refcnt will be leaked.
>> - */
>> - list_splice_init(&split_folios, ret_folios);
>> /* nr_failed isn't updated for not used */
>> nr_large_failed += large_retry;
>> stats->nr_thp_failed += thp_retry;
>> @@ -1733,7 +1720,7 @@ static int migrate_pages_batch(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
>> if (is_large) {
>> large_retry++;
>> thp_retry += is_thp;
>> - } else if (!no_split_folio_counting) {
>> + } else {
>> retry++;
>> }
>> nr_retry_pages += nr_pages;
>> @@ -1756,7 +1743,7 @@ static int migrate_pages_batch(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
>> if (is_large) {
>> nr_large_failed++;
>> stats->nr_thp_failed += is_thp;
>> - } else if (!no_split_folio_counting) {
>> + } else {
>> nr_failed++;
>> }
>> @@ -1774,9 +1761,7 @@ static int migrate_pages_batch(struct
>> list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
>> try_to_unmap_flush();
>> retry = 1;
>> - for (pass = 0;
>> - pass < NR_MAX_MIGRATE_PAGES_RETRY && (retry || large_retry);
>> - pass++) {
>> + for (pass = 0; pass < nr_pass && (retry || large_retry); pass++) {
>> retry = 0;
>> large_retry = 0;
>> thp_retry = 0;
>> @@ -1805,7 +1790,7 @@ static int migrate_pages_batch(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
>> if (is_large) {
>> large_retry++;
>> thp_retry += is_thp;
>> - } else if (!no_split_folio_counting) {
>> + } else {
>> retry++;
>> }
>> nr_retry_pages += nr_pages;
>> @@ -1818,7 +1803,7 @@ static int migrate_pages_batch(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
>> if (is_large) {
>> nr_large_failed++;
>> stats->nr_thp_failed += is_thp;
>> - } else if (!no_split_folio_counting) {
>> + } else {
>> nr_failed++;
>> }
>> @@ -1855,27 +1840,6 @@ static int migrate_pages_batch(struct
>> list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
>> dst2 = list_next_entry(dst, lru);
>> }
>> - /*
>> - * Try to migrate split folios of fail-to-migrate large folios, no
>> - * nr_failed counting in this round, since all split folios of a
>> - * large folio is counted as 1 failure in the first round.
>> - */
>> - if (rc >= 0 && !list_empty(&split_folios)) {
>> - /*
>> - * Move non-migrated folios (after NR_MAX_MIGRATE_PAGES_RETRY
>> - * retries) to ret_folios to avoid migrating them again.
>> - */
>> - list_splice_init(from, ret_folios);
>> - list_splice_init(&split_folios, from);
>> - /*
>> - * Force async mode to avoid to wait lock or bit when we have
>> - * locked more than one folios.
>> - */
>> - mode = MIGRATE_ASYNC;
>> - no_split_folio_counting = true;
>> - goto retry;
>> - }
>> -
>> return rc;
>> }
>> @@ -1914,6 +1878,7 @@ int migrate_pages(struct list_head *from,
>> new_page_t get_new_page,
>> struct folio *folio, *folio2;
>> LIST_HEAD(folios);
>> LIST_HEAD(ret_folios);
>> + LIST_HEAD(split_folios);
>> struct migrate_pages_stats stats;
>> trace_mm_migrate_pages_start(mode, reason);
>> @@ -1947,12 +1912,23 @@ int migrate_pages(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page,
>> else
>> list_splice_init(from, &folios);
>> rc = migrate_pages_batch(&folios, get_new_page, put_new_page, private,
>> - mode, reason, &ret_folios, &stats);
>> + mode, reason, &ret_folios, &split_folios, &stats,
>> + NR_MAX_MIGRATE_PAGES_RETRY);
>> list_splice_tail_init(&folios, &ret_folios);
>> if (rc < 0) {
>> rc_gather = rc;
>> + list_splice_tail(&split_folios, &ret_folios);
>
> Can we still keep the original comments? Which can help to understand
> the case, at least for me:)
> /*
> * There might be some split folios of fail-to-migrate large
> * folios left in split_folios list. Move them to ret_folios
> * list so that they could be put back to the right list by
> * the caller otherwise the folio refcnt will be leaked.
> */

Previously, the cleanup code is buried in a corner of a much more
complex code path. So the comments are necessary. Now, it is an
explicit and simple code path. And, the rule is clear, every folio list
needs to be cleaned up before return: folios, split_folios, then
ret_folios. And we have done this here and there in the series.

>> goto out;
>> }
>> + if (!list_empty(&split_folios)) {
>> + /*
>> + * Failure isn't counted since all split folios of a large folio
>> + * is counted as 1 failure already.
>> + */
>> + migrate_pages_batch(&split_folios, get_new_page, put_new_page, private,
>> + MIGRATE_ASYNC, reason, &ret_folios, NULL, &stats, 1);
>
> Better to copy the original comments to explain why force to
> MIGRATE_ASYNC mode for split folios.

Yes. It's a good idea to explain that. And now the rule to call
migrate_pages_batch() has been changed. If mode != MIGRATE_ASYNC, the
length of "from" must be <= 1. I will add a VM_WARN_ON() for that at
the beginning of migrate_pages_batch(). And I would rather to add the
comments to the header of migrate_pages(). Other callers of the
function needs to follow that rule too.

> Thanks for the simplification, and please feel free to add:
> Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thank you very much for review!

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

Next message: Ojaswin Mujoo: "Re: [PATCH v4 8/9] ext4: Use rbtrees to manage PAs instead of inode i_prealloc_list"
Previous message: Tao Zhang: "Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] coresight-tpdm: Add reset node to TPDM node"
Next in thread: Baolin Wang: "Re: [PATCH 2/3] migrate_pages: move split folios processing out of migrate_pages_batch()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]