Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] sched/numa: Enhance vma scanning

[Raghavendra K T]

On 3/1/2023 9:46 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> On 3/1/2023 2:54 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 10:20:18 +0530 Raghavendra K T 
> > <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > >   The patchset proposes one of the enhancements to numa vma scanning
> > > suggested by Mel. This is continuation of [3].
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > >   include/linux/mm.h       | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > >   include/linux/mm_types.h |  9 +++++++
> > >   kernel/fork.c            |  2 ++
> > >   kernel/sched/fair.c      | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >   mm/memory.c              |  3 +++
> >
> > It's unclear (to me) which tree would normally carry these.
> >
> > But there are significant textual conflicts with the "Per-VMA locks"
> > patchset, and there might be functional issues as well.  So mm.git
> > would be the better choice.
> >
> > Please can you redo and retest against tomorrow's mm-unstable branch
> > (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm)?  Hopefully the
> > sched developers can take a look and provide feedback.
>
> Thank you Andrew. Sure will do that.

Thanks again, Sent rebased patches,

Just to record, so that new discussion can happen in new posting

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1677672277.git.raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxx/T/#t