Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/mmap: remove unnecessary vp->vma check in vma_prepare

[Suren Baghdasaryan]

On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 6:10 AM Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> * Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx> [230228 21:27]:
> > vp->vma in vma_prepare() is always non-NULL, therefore checking it is
> > not necessary. Remove the extra check.
> >
> > Fixes: e8f071350ea5 ("mm/mmap: write-lock VMAs in vma_prepare before modifying them")
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202302281802.J93Nma7q-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
> > Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Fix cleanly apply over mm-unstable, SHA in "Fixes" is from that tree.
> >
> >  mm/mmap.c | 3 +--
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> > index 0cd3714c2182..0759d53b470c 100644
> > --- a/mm/mmap.c
> > +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> > @@ -505,8 +505,7 @@ static inline void init_vma_prep(struct vma_prepare *vp,
> >   */
> >  static inline void vma_prepare(struct vma_prepare *vp)
> >  {
> > -     if (vp->vma)
> > -             vma_start_write(vp->vma);
> > +     vma_start_write(vp->vma);
>
> Would a WARN_ON_ONCE() be worth it?  Maybe not since it will be detected
> rather quickly once we dereference it below, but it might make it more
> clear as to what happened?

WARN_ON_ONCE() seems like an overkill to me. It always follows after
init_multi_vma_prep()/init_vma_prep() both of which set the VMA. Risk
should be minimal here and as you said, misuse is easily discoverable.

>
> I'm happy either way.
>
> Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> >       if (vp->adj_next)
> >               vma_start_write(vp->adj_next);
> >       /* vp->insert is always a newly created VMA, no need for locking */
> > --
> > 2.39.2.722.g9855ee24e9-goog
> >