Re: [PATCH v13 00/13] Add PSR support for eDP

[Doug Anderson]

Hi,

On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 8:29 AM Vinod Polimera
<quic_vpolimer@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Changes in v2:
>   - Use dp bridge to set psr entry/exit instead of dpu_enocder.
>   - Don't modify whitespaces.
>   - Set self refresh aware from atomic_check.
>   - Set self refresh aware only if psr is supported.
>   - Provide a stub for msm_dp_display_set_psr.
>   - Move dp functions to bridge code.
>
> Changes in v3:
>   - Change callback names to reflect atomic interfaces.
>   - Move bridge callback change to separate patch as suggested by Dmitry.
>   - Remove psr function declaration from msm_drv.h.
>   - Set self_refresh_aware flag only if psr is supported.
>   - Modify the variable names to simpler form.
>   - Define bit fields for PSR settings.
>   - Add comments explaining the steps to enter/exit psr.
>   - Change DRM_INFO to drm_dbg_db.
>
> Changes in v4:
>   - Move the get crtc functions to drm_atomic.
>   - Add atomic functions for DP bridge too.
>   - Add ternary operator to choose eDP or DP ops.
>   - Return true/false instead of 1/0.
>   - mode_valid missing in the eDP bridge ops.
>   - Move the functions to get crtc into drm_atomic.c.
>   - Fix compilation issues.
>   - Remove dpu_assign_crtc and get crtc from drm_enc instead of dpu_enc.
>   - Check for crtc state enable while reserving resources.
>
> Changes in v5:
>   - Move the mode_valid changes into a different patch.
>   - Complete psr_op_comp only when isr is set.
>   - Move the DP atomic callback changes to a different patch.
>   - Get crtc from drm connector state crtc.
>   - Move to separate patch for check for crtc state enable while
> reserving resources.
>
> Changes in v6:
>   - Remove crtc from dpu_encoder_virt struct.
>   - fix crtc check during vblank toggle crtc.
>   - Misc changes.
>
> Changes in v7:
>   - Add fix for underrun issue on kasan build.
>
> Changes in v8:
>   - Drop the enc spinlock as it won't serve any purpose in
> protetcing conn state.(Dmitry/Doug)
>
> Changes in v9:
>   - Update commit message and fix alignment using spaces.(Marijn)
>   - Misc changes.(Marijn)
>
> Changes in v10:
>   - Get crtc cached in dpu_enc during obj init.(Dmitry)
>
> Changes in v11:
>   - Remove crtc cached in dpu_enc during obj init.
>   - Update dpu_enc crtc state on crtc enable/disable during self refresh.
>
> Changes in v12:
>   - Update sc7180 intf mask to get intf timing gen status
> based on DPU_INTF_STATUS_SUPPORTED bit.(Dmitry)
>   - Remove "clear active interface in the datapath cleanup" change
> as it is already included.
>
> Changes in v13:
>   - Move core changes to top of the series.(Dmitry)
>   - Drop self refresh aware disable change after psr entry.(Dmitry)
>
> Vinod Polimera (13):
>   drm: add helper functions to retrieve old and new crtc
>   drm/bridge: use atomic enable/disable callbacks for panel bridge
>   drm/bridge: add psr support for panel bridge callbacks
>   drm/msm/disp/dpu: check for crtc enable rather than crtc active to
>     release shared resources
>   drm/msm/disp/dpu: get timing engine status from intf status register
>   drm/msm/disp/dpu: wait for extra vsync till timing engine status is
>     disabled
>   drm/msm/disp/dpu: reset the datapath after timing engine disable
>   drm/msm/dp: use atomic callbacks for DP bridge ops
>   drm/msm/dp: Add basic PSR support for eDP
>   drm/msm/dp: use the eDP bridge ops to validate eDP modes
>   drm/msm/disp/dpu: use atomic enable/disable callbacks for encoder
>     functions
>   drm/msm/disp/dpu: add PSR support for eDP interface in dpu driver
>   drm/msm/disp/dpu: update dpu_enc crtc state on crtc enable/disable
>     during self refresh

I'm curious what the plan is for landing this series. I could land the
first two in drm-misc if you want, but I'm a lowly committer and so I
couldn't make an immutable branch for you nor can I officially Ack the
changes to land in your branch. That means you'd be blocked for an
extra version. Do you already have a plan? If not, then maybe we need
to get in touch with one of the maintainers [1] of drm-misc? That's
documented [2] to be in their set of responsibilities.

[1] https://drm.pages.freedesktop.org/maintainer-tools/repositories.html#drm-misc-repository
[2] https://drm.pages.freedesktop.org/maintainer-tools/maintainer-drm-misc.html#maintainer-s-duties

-Doug