Re: [PATCH] ext4: Fix comment about the 64BIT feature

[Darrick J. Wong]

On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 01:38:42PM +0000, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> 64BIT is part of the incompatible feature set, update the comment
> accordingly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/ext4/ext4.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> index 140e1eb300d1..85c153e120b9 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> @@ -1387,7 +1387,7 @@ struct ext4_super_block {
>  	__le32	s_first_meta_bg;	/* First metablock block group */
>  	__le32	s_mkfs_time;		/* When the filesystem was created */
>  	__le32	s_jnl_blocks[17];	/* Backup of the journal inode */
> -	/* 64bit support valid if EXT4_FEATURE_COMPAT_64BIT */
> +	/* 64bit support valid if EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_64BIT */

Correct.
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>

--D

>  /*150*/	__le32	s_blocks_count_hi;	/* Blocks count */
>  	__le32	s_r_blocks_count_hi;	/* Reserved blocks count */
>  	__le32	s_free_blocks_count_hi;	/* Free blocks count */
> -- 
> 2.39.2.722.g9855ee24e9-goog
>