Re: [PATCH 4/4] kmsan: add memsetXX tests
From: Marco Elver
Date: Thu Mar 02 2023 - 06:23:22 EST
On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 at 15:39, Alexander Potapenko <glider@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Add tests ensuring that memset16()/memset32()/memset64() are
> instrumented by KMSAN and correctly initialize the memory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/kmsan/kmsan_test.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/kmsan/kmsan_test.c b/mm/kmsan/kmsan_test.c
> index cc98a3f4e0899..e450a000441fb 100644
> --- a/mm/kmsan/kmsan_test.c
> +++ b/mm/kmsan/kmsan_test.c
> @@ -503,6 +503,25 @@ static void test_memcpy_aligned_to_unaligned2(struct kunit *test)
> KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, report_matches(&expect));
> }
>
> +/* Generate test cases for memset16(), memset32(), memset64(). */
> +#define DEFINE_TEST_MEMSETXX(size, var_ty) \
> + static void test_memset##size(struct kunit *test) \
> + { \
> + EXPECTATION_NO_REPORT(expect); \
> + volatile var_ty uninit; \
This could just be 'uint##size##_t' and you can drop 'var_ty'.
> + \
> + kunit_info(test, \
> + "memset" #size "() should initialize memory\n"); \
> + DO_NOT_OPTIMIZE(uninit); \
> + memset##size((var_ty *)&uninit, 0, 1); \
> + kmsan_check_memory((void *)&uninit, sizeof(uninit)); \
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, report_matches(&expect)); \
> + }
> +
> +DEFINE_TEST_MEMSETXX(16, uint16_t)
> +DEFINE_TEST_MEMSETXX(32, uint32_t)
> +DEFINE_TEST_MEMSETXX(64, uint64_t)
> +
> static noinline void fibonacci(int *array, int size, int start)
> {
> if (start < 2 || (start == size))
> @@ -549,6 +568,9 @@ static struct kunit_case kmsan_test_cases[] = {
> KUNIT_CASE(test_memcpy_aligned_to_aligned),
> KUNIT_CASE(test_memcpy_aligned_to_unaligned),
> KUNIT_CASE(test_memcpy_aligned_to_unaligned2),
> + KUNIT_CASE(test_memset16),
> + KUNIT_CASE(test_memset32),
> + KUNIT_CASE(test_memset64),
> KUNIT_CASE(test_long_origin_chain),
> {},
> };
> --
> 2.39.2.722.g9855ee24e9-goog
>