Re: [PATCHv2 3/6] zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping

[Sergey Senozhatsky]

On (23/03/02 17:38), Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Otherwise I can create two big enums for fullness and stats.
> 
> Let's go with two enums at this moment since your great work is not
> tied into the problem. If that becomes really maintaince hole,
> we could tidy it up at that time.

OK.

> 
> > What's your preference on inuse_0 and inuse_100 naming? Do we
> > keep unified naming or should it be INUSE_MIN/INUSE_MAX or
> > EMPTY/FULL?
> 
> I don't have strong opinion about it. I will follow your choice. ;-)

OK :)

> prologue - seq_printf
> for (ratio = min, ratio < max; ratio++ )
>     seq_printf(s, "%lu", get_stat(ratio)
> epilogue - seq_printf
> seq_puts(s, "\n");

Let me try a loop.