Il 02/03/23 15:12, Yassine Oudjana ha scritto:
From: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Several DT bindings of MediaTek display blocks make unnecessary use of
"oneOf" and "items". Remove them and replace them with enums where
necessary.
Signed-off-by: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes since v1:
- Leave enums with 1 element as they are.
.../bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,ccorr.yaml | 7 +++----
.../bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,color.yaml | 10 ++++------
.../bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dither.yaml | 3 +--
.../bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dsc.yaml | 4 +---
.../bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,gamma.yaml | 7 +++----
.../bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,merge.yaml | 8 +++-----
.../bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,od.yaml | 8 +++-----
.../bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,ovl-2l.yaml | 7 +++----
.../bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,ovl.yaml | 13 +++++--------
.../display/mediatek/mediatek,postmask.yaml | 3 +--
.../bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,rdma.yaml | 13 +++++--------
.../bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,split.yaml | 4 +---
.../bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,ufoe.yaml | 4 +---
.../bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,wdma.yaml | 4 +---
14 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,ccorr.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,ccorr.yaml
index b04820c95b22..dc22bd522523 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,ccorr.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,ccorr.yaml
@@ -21,10 +21,9 @@ description: |
properties:
compatible:
oneOf:
- - items:
- - const: mediatek,mt8183-disp-ccorr
- - items:
- - const: mediatek,mt8192-disp-ccorr
+ - enum:
+ - mediatek,mt8183-disp-ccorr
+ - mediatek,mt8192-disp-ccorr
This change is ok.
- items:
- enum:
- mediatek,mt8188-disp-ccorr
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,color.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,color.yaml
index 62306c88f485..d0ea77fc4b06 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,color.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,color.yaml
@@ -22,12 +22,10 @@ description: |
properties:
compatible:
oneOf:
- - items:
- - const: mediatek,mt2701-disp-color
- - items:
- - const: mediatek,mt8167-disp-color
- - items:
- - const: mediatek,mt8173-disp-color
+ - enum:
+ - mediatek,mt2701-disp-color
+ - mediatek,mt8167-disp-color
+ - mediatek,mt8173-disp-color
OK.
- items:
- enum:
- mediatek,mt7623-disp-color
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dither.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dither.yaml
index 5c7445c174e5..9d74de63fe63 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dither.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dither.yaml
@@ -22,8 +22,7 @@ description: |
properties:
compatible:
oneOf:
- - items:
- - const: mediatek,mt8183-disp-dither
+ - const: mediatek,mt8183-disp-dither
OK.
- items:
- enum:
- mediatek,mt8186-disp-dither
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dsc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dsc.yaml
index 49248864514b..37bf6bf4a1ab 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dsc.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dsc.yaml
@@ -19,9 +19,7 @@ description: |
properties:
compatible:
- oneOf:
- - items:
- - const: mediatek,mt8195-disp-dsc
+ const: mediatek,mt8195-disp-dsc
This will grow, and you'll get devicetree declaring something like:
compatible = "mediatek,(different-new-chip)-disp-dsc";
and
compatible = "mediatek,(current-chip)-disp-dsc", "mediatek,mt8195-disp-dsc";
Note: Some smartphone SoCs (Dimensity series) do have the same disp-dsc as
the Chromebook variant MT8195! :-)
reg:
maxItems: 1
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,gamma.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,gamma.yaml
index a5c6a91fac71..6c2be9d6840b 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,gamma.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,gamma.yaml
@@ -21,10 +21,9 @@ description: |
properties:
compatible:
oneOf:
- - items:
- - const: mediatek,mt8173-disp-gamma
- - items:
- - const: mediatek,mt8183-disp-gamma
+ - enum:
+ - mediatek,mt8173-disp-gamma
+ - mediatek,mt8183-disp-gamma
This change is ok.
- items:
- enum:
- mediatek,mt8186-disp-gamma
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,merge.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,merge.yaml
index 69ba75777dac..c474ee6fa05b 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,merge.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,merge.yaml
@@ -20,11 +20,9 @@ description: |
properties:
compatible:
- oneOf:
- - items:
- - const: mediatek,mt8173-disp-merge
- - items:
- - const: mediatek,mt8195-disp-merge
+ enum:
+ - mediatek,mt8173-disp-merge
+ - mediatek,mt8195-disp-merge
I'm mostly sure that you (yes, you, Yassine) will sooner or later write a
devicetree node containing the following compatible string on merge0:
compatible = "mediatek,mt6735-disp-merge", "mediatek,mt8173-disp-merge";
Am I wrong? :-)
In that case, that `oneOf:` will have to return back to this file, so it's
not worth removing it.
reg:Same story with this one...
maxItems: 1
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,od.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,od.yaml
index 853fcb9db2be..7e6bbf8b5c60 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,od.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,od.yaml
@@ -20,11 +20,9 @@ description: |
properties:
compatible:
- oneOf:
- - items:
- - const: mediatek,mt2712-disp-od
- - items:
- - const: mediatek,mt8173-disp-od
+ enum:
+ - mediatek,mt2712-disp-od
+ - mediatek,mt8173-disp-od
reg:
maxItems: 1
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,ovl-2l.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,ovl-2l.yaml
index 4e94f4e947ad..c7dd0ef02dcf 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,ovl-2l.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,ovl-2l.yaml
@@ -21,10 +21,9 @@ description: |
properties:
compatible:
oneOf:
- - items:
- - const: mediatek,mt8183-disp-ovl-2l
- - items:
- - const: mediatek,mt8192-disp-ovl-2l
+ - enum:
+ - mediatek,mt8183-disp-ovl-2l
+ - mediatek,mt8192-disp-ovl-2l
This change is ok.
- items:
- enum:
- mediatek,mt8186-disp-ovl-2l
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,ovl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,ovl.yaml
index 065e526f950e..92e320d54ba2 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,ovl.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,ovl.yaml
@@ -21,14 +21,11 @@ description: |
properties:
compatible:
oneOf:
- - items:
- - const: mediatek,mt2701-disp-ovl
- - items:
- - const: mediatek,mt8173-disp-ovl
- - items:
- - const: mediatek,mt8183-disp-ovl
- - items:
- - const: mediatek,mt8192-disp-ovl
+ - enum:
+ - mediatek,mt2701-disp-ovl
+ - mediatek,mt8173-disp-ovl
+ - mediatek,mt8183-disp-ovl
+ - mediatek,mt8192-disp-ovl
This is ok too.
- items:
- enum:
- mediatek,mt7623-disp-ovl
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,postmask.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,postmask.yaml
index 27de64495401..12ec410bb921 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,postmask.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,postmask.yaml
@@ -21,8 +21,7 @@ description: |
properties:
compatible:
oneOf:
- - items:
- - const: mediatek,mt8192-disp-postmask
+ - const: mediatek,mt8192-disp-postmask
Should be fine as well.
- items:
- enum:
- mediatek,mt8186-disp-postmask
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,rdma.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,rdma.yaml
index 3ade2ece3fed..42059efad45d 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,rdma.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,rdma.yaml
@@ -23,14 +23,11 @@ description: |
properties:
compatible:
oneOf:
- - items:
- - const: mediatek,mt2701-disp-rdma
- - items:
- - const: mediatek,mt8173-disp-rdma
- - items:
- - const: mediatek,mt8183-disp-rdma
- - items:
- - const: mediatek,mt8195-disp-rdma
+ - enum:
+ - mediatek,mt2701-disp-rdma
+ - mediatek,mt8173-disp-rdma
+ - mediatek,mt8183-disp-rdma
+ - mediatek,mt8195-disp-rdma
OK.
- items:
- enum:
- mediatek,mt8188-disp-rdma
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,split.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,split.yaml
index 35ace1f322e8..54b7b0531144 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,split.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,split.yaml
@@ -20,9 +20,7 @@ description: |
properties:
compatible:
- oneOf:
- - items:
- - const: mediatek,mt8173-disp-split
+ const: mediatek,mt8173-disp-split
compatible = "mediatek,mt6795-disp-split", "mediatek,mt8173-disp-split";
I have exactly that in my local devicetree for Xperia M5 (not upstream yet) so
no, I wouldn't do that :-)
reg:Same, and I think UFOE is present on your MT6735 as well.
maxItems: 1
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,ufoe.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,ufoe.yaml
index b8bb135fe96b..87523b45a210 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,ufoe.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,ufoe.yaml
@@ -21,9 +21,7 @@ description: |
properties:
compatible:
- oneOf:
- - items:
- - const: mediatek,mt8173-disp-ufoe
+ const: mediatek,mt8173-disp-ufoe
reg:This is present on all MediaTek SoCs - literally. The issue is that the driver
maxItems: 1
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,wdma.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,wdma.yaml
index 7d7cc1ab526b..52f233fe1c0f 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,wdma.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,wdma.yaml
@@ -20,9 +20,7 @@ description: |
properties:
compatible:
- oneOf:
- - items:
- - const: mediatek,mt8173-disp-wdma
+ const: mediatek,mt8173-disp-wdma
currently does not support command mode panels for real, so this binding is...
...well, somehow in forgotten-land...
I would hope that command mode panels get implemented soon(er-than-later), but
I'll leave the choice to you and Krzysztof - I'm only providing the information
here. :-)
reg:
maxItems: 1
Thanks for the effort!
Cheers,
Angelo